Sumlit
San Claudio Bravo
Yes, but if he's at the right or left side he won't be dragging any defenders with him, he will just get tagged by a fullback. Besides by moving him away from the center, you're almost nullifying his threat; so the CF doesn't really contribute anything to this play other than adding traffic. The other point I will add is that it's much harder to coordinate between 3 players instead of 2, and when you have the CF facing the goal you're forcing Messi/Neymar to track his movement rather than make their own moves, which can be limiting in some cases. Now,
No, because he does not drift entirely to the wing, he remains in the box, just the the edges. He drags the mark of at least 1 CB. It does not nullify the CF because he is still in striking range, while at the same time, creating space for other players. This is how CFs play.
You don't need to coordinate 3 players. On the build-up play, 2 players build up, the third moves in space to get position or open space. Barca forwards play this way, but they do it in wider positions because they are wingers. A CF knows how to move centrally.
Well, if Messi or Neymar is playing in the CF position then he has to get past even fewer players than if he was playing behind a CF. See, the thing is we both agree that a CF can be very effective for creating space. The way I see it, with Messi & Neymar spearheading the attack 1 of them can act as a CF to draw the CB leaving space for the player carrying the ball or you can just past it to them if they're already in an advanced position. That's basically what you said, but notice that in your scenario 1 player is carrying the ball, the other is drawing defenders away from him; the 3rd player is basically uninvolved. So why field another CF who is arguably not as good a finisher as either Messi or Neymar (potential wise) when you can field an AM (Fabregas) who can actually supply the deadly pass to them.
You're not seeing the point. If Messi is the CF dragging marks, then Neymar has no link-up partner. The moment Messi moves to link-up, he drags marks into the combination play, putting both of them in a disadvantage. In my scenario the 3rd player is not uninvolved, he is serving the purpose of looking for position and dragging marks. This, again, is what CF do.
The whole idea of adding a CF is to give more space, more prominence, more freedom to the Messi and Neymar duo, while giving them a target point to unload assists. The CF will also be a natural scorer, which helps the team. You can still play Fabregas regardless, but now he has 3 targets instead of 2 highly marked ones.
I don't watch Brazil/Argentina that often so I'll have to take your word for it, but here again if they're so effective because they have a CF playing upfront then all you need is to play Messi & Neymar in the center and you'll end up with an even better CF. I'll say this though, I don't think that playing with a CF in front of N&M is bad idea; in fact I think it can be a very effective tactical weapon that we're currently lacking –*but to play it effectively you have to place N&M out wide which makes it more of a tactical formation because N&M are not playing in their ideal position.
No. The reason they are effective is because their respective CFs buy space for them. If you're going to ask one of them to be a CF to drag defenders for the other, you are handicapping one to a reduced role, and the other with a lack of partner. Also, while Messi can play as a CF because he is strong despite his size, Neymar cannot play a CF. So when he is doing the CF role, he will be ineffective.