psychotsek
Member
yes but your argument doesn't take into account the fact that the club have a replacement ready to step in. Montoya isn't as good as Dani, obviously, but he is an excellent player and a hugely promising prospect and most importantly doesn't cost a thing.
so you lose a player like Dani Alves, who has a huge contract and is 30 with his best years behind him, and you can get 40-50m for him, so then you can use that money to strengthen the squad elsewhere. like in attack, or at LB where all our prospects are, bar a miracle, 3-4 years away from breaking through.
like I said, I don't AGREE with it, because I think it would be beneficial to everyone for Dani to stay, and Montoya to spend a year as his backup. Dani is a peerless RB and an integral part of the way we do things, but if we spend a season with Montoya watching and learning, we can sell Dani next summer and Montoya will be in a much better position to step in and take over.
Sorry maybe i didn't make myself clear enough.I totally agree with you POV.
Only two things we differ is Dani's age and pricing.His prime is yet to be seen.
Ask any professional athlete and the responce you get is that 30 is the perfect age both physically and mentally.
In a world where Torres is sold for 40 MILLION POUNDS Dani's price should be in the 50-60m mark period.
Even if we get that money this will set Barca back a lot.New players will need time to adapt provided they are good enough and so on.
Anyway hope it turns out we are just over thinking about a tweet and nothing more.