Neeraj
Senior Member
I have never seen so many blind posters in any other forum but this. One of the issues of EV's plan was Coutinho in an unorthodox role, once he is gone (replaced after Roberto's red) we played much better. EV was forced to make a change and introduce Semedo and Paulinho and switch to 4-3-2. What we played in the second half was obviously not part of his original plan.
But I also think we underestimate how much the players themselves improved, in terms of intensity and motive, led by Messi. As I said in another post, when we went down to 10, players start playing a little more instinctively than according to a set plan because of the disadvantage, and you could see the runs, pressing, etc. were far better in the second half.
That's why many feel Valverde is an anti coach at times. Lots of people mentioned here that we'd have beaten Roma if we had no coach and the players were left to do whatever they wanted, and this is the reason why people get that feeling.