Maradona37
Well-known member
He was ok but the way they go on about him is way OTT. Also, youtube videos by their nature are very misleading.think he was good, some great passes, won 2 times the ball back and made nice runs into the box
Also, read this online from someone else, this is how I feel about Bellingham:
'Bellingham is one of those players that i read constantly how amazing he is but when i watch him i dont see it. But everyone says so , So then i doubt myself.
But having seen him again last night i know im right!!!
Ive come to the conclusion that the people that say hes brilliant arent actually very knowledgable , hear others say it and repeat because itll make them sound as though they know their stuff.'
What I have noticed about Bellingham is that he has no concept of a weight of pass, can't dribble, is poor in tight spaces, can't control games in midfield, and has little subtlety to his game. He's basically a young, powerful guy who is good at breaking into the box to score goals - he plays like a worse Lampard or Gerrard. I have noticed this at Real Madrid too.
He's good looking (to some), young, English, tall, strong, confident, is more of an athletic than technical player (many people prefer athleticism over technique) has a lot of PR hype. I think all of this coalesces to account for the completely over the top drooling over him and I agree that a lot of people lick his arsehole because it's the 'done' thing to do and what you are 'supposed' to believe, rather than actually analysing his game and seeing how mediocre it is. Unfortunately a lot of football fans don't think deeply about the game. and believe everything the media feeds them, particularly the English media.
I have criticised Ronaldo, but that is only relative to the all-time greats - he's in a different stratosphere of talent to Bellingham and can actually back up a lot of his hype. Bellingham will never be able to back up his hype.
Last edited: