Not at all.
Napoli got 2 early goals, and then they sat back and let Leicester play, but Leicester could not threaten enough.
When Leicester found 2 goals from not big chances, Napoli took the lead again, and then sat back again.
Basically Napoli controlled the flow of that game
Nah you are the one that loves xG and Leicester had better on that and were more dominant side.
Leicester had more of ball, more chances and better xG.. 1.33 v 2.05.
Napoli scored two early. Then Leicester were better team and got it back to 2-2 with more of ball and better chances. Napoli were not in control of game and scoring twice is 'threatening enough' from Leicester.
They had injuries and on balance of play were fortunate to win it.
You made a statement that was blatantly not true and trying to find way to back it up and ignore your own metrics to show who was usually the side that had the better chances.
Had money on Napoli and was nervy game where they didnt not dominate Leicester in slightest. You didnt watch it clearly.