khaled_a_d
Senior Member
Khaled, when I said that Bayern, Juve, Real are better organized than us, I meant: historically in terms of spending, wages, expenditures.
Barca and Real are the biggest spenders in the last 25 years.
Barca has the highest wages ever in a history of football.
Barca has the highest amount of expensive flops like Dembele, Cou, Griezmann, Frenkie.
Clubs consists of people who changes, they aren't doing well because of the logo.
Barca were well run under Nunez, one of the best run organization under Laporta, and one of the worst run under Gaspart and Bartou. We all know that, no need for wall of text for it.
Laporta is currently the president, and he has recruited the CEO of a company that has revenue that is probably bigger than the entire 32 clubs playing in CL, recruited a ruthless experienced executive in Alemany who has massive experience in Spain and was wanted by Perez before.
My main concern is Planas, the guy is experienced and connected but he is small club guy which can be an issue.
About the part where you mention how we don't need 11 superstars to win league titles, true.
But those teams have 3-4-5 world class players and the rest are "fillers".
Salah is among top3 on his position.
Becker also. Van Dijk also.
Real has Benzema, Modric, Kroos, Casemiro.
Who do we have?
Who is a Barca's player closest to top5-10 in his position?
Probably Frenkie or Pedri.
That is my whole point, we don't have a single one.
Fati and Pedri has the potential to be ones, Araujo too. Dest has a "long shot" and it is partially due to lack of quality in this position in football.
And no, Frenkie isn't, Pedri currently isn't. They are closer to top 15-20 range, which is fine for a starter in midfield, but needs world class players.
Barca atm has 3 main squad issues:
A-No world class players
B-Non balanced squad, players don't cover for each other weaknesses at all, age distribution is bad, few multi dimensional players albeit many versatile ones.
C-We have 3 starting positions of clear weaknesses, CB, DM & RW.
You add that to having a coach who isn't top 20 in Europe, and it is a struggle.
But non of those issues aren't fixable at all, and many clubs in worse positions fixed them.
Odds are actually in our favour, the question is just in how many years?
On top of that, Gaspart had money.
Right now we have a worse team, no superstars, no leaders, we are broke and we are torn between Pep's football and moving away from it.
Also, the European opponents are better than 20 years ago due to oil money at Psg, City and Newcastle and rich sponsor-deals EPL teams.
Gaspart had money, but didn't leave his successor much of it and yet he build a CL winner team in his 3rd year.
We have higher revenue than before, most of overpaid earner are of the books by end of next season.
Next year we will most likely have enough money to add few players, although a lot hangs on Griezmann and trincao options getting exercised.
And especially: we will lose years going in circles whether we should copy Pep's team from 2008-2011 or try something new, due to a burden of too much success in a history and where the club, the board, fans, media and players bought the narrative that we are different, more than a club and how we should be sticking to our roots and principles.
Let's forget a little about the fans fantasies here, and talk about current decision makers:
Alemany: not a Crujifista, not by a mile.
Planas: Not a Crujifista either.
Jordi Cruyff: Well, it is clear he likes his dad ideas, but there is also a chance he understands his dad work better, as EV said problem in Barca is fans more loyal to Crujif way than Crujif himself.
Laporta: Sure, in public he is the biggest Crujif supporter, like ever.
But here is what we also know:
Laporta wanted Mourinho over Pep in 2008, but choose the later due to Txiki and Crujif opinion. Laporta always had the tendency to take his trusties opinion in football matter.
Laporta came in, wanted one of Flick or Nagelsmann, Bayen and NT fucked him over.
Laporta list of candidates according to the media have :
-Martinez
-Pirlo
-Diego Martinez (not many reports tbf)
-Gallardo
-Ten Haag
-Xavi
-1st 4 have nothing to do with Pep.
-Ten Haag sounds a lot like Pepista, a Ducth Ajax coach who was at Bayern during Pep tenure, right?
But watching current Ajax team they are built more like a Klopp team. Their midfield is the worst line by far but their defense and attack are brilliant and knows how to move and pass to support their average midfield.
The only one who was linked to our coaching job who is really a Crujifista is Xavi, and that is because of his legacy here. And even then it is reported that Laporta isn't his biggest fan.
Xavi will be always a popular choice because we know we can get him, well get support of players and fans and bring stability. In case no valid candidates is available I think that is only when Laporta will have to swallow his pride and hire him. But not because of him being Barca DNA
Lastly, which player Laporta wants most atm? Halaand
Is he really any close to Barca DNA? I doubt it.
I just think the whole Barca DNA is a marketing strategy the club ha successfully created, don't expect the club to execute it but don't expect them to stop talking about it