I don't have the answer for those question ,there is a reason I am fan on internet forum not being a sporting director somewhere
,there is those who are earning a lot to make those decisions ,whom we can judge their success
Ok.
But, you see, other users are "smart" today, and NOW, they have replies: "This or that was wrong, we should have done XX"
It is the same like when someone comes after the match and says: "We should have played Rakitic, and not Iniesta."
It is easy to be "smart" after something is already done.
In that sense, I am asking (not you in particular), but other users (Zangash, for example) who said that we shouldn't have loaned him.
So, now we have Halilovic, my question is: "What would you do with him in order to get the best out of him?"
=> so, some users say that we shouldn't loan him. My opinion is that we will surely ruin Halilovic, for example, if he stays with the 1st team in the next Season.
Also, about loans, when the loan is finished, people can give 1000s of excuses why the player hasn't developed too much:
1. he went to a foreign league (Everton), that was a mistake
= he should have played in our country, Spain, to learn to play in our La Liga
2. he went to a too strong team (Sevilla), and he can't get enough of minutes there. It was a mistake
= he should have picked a weaker team
3. but then, if he picks a weaker team and if that team plays a crap football or defensive football, people will again reply:
= his teammates were too poor in that team, and he couldn't improve/show anything
=> he should have gone to some stronger team
So, basically, after reading this forum and excuses from our fans why some of our gems didn't make it, it seems that we need a loan of this type:
1. a Spanish La liga team
2. a team shouldn't be too strong, because our player won't play too much
-- but a team shouldn't be too weak, because he won't be able to develop in that team
3. further, that team should have a style similar to Barcelona
-- if you pick a team who plays long balls or counterattacks, our players won't fit there because they are trained to play in a possession-tiki-taka-shortpassing team
So, in that sense, basically, there are only 2-3 midtable teams in Spain who would fit this profile.
Plus, teams like Ajax or some Portuguese teams who plays similarly to Barca.
-- basically, those are the only teams where we could loan our players, to avoid these excuses from our forum that always SOMEONE ELSE is guilty because a young gem didn't make it
but we aren't producing the 1st team players we used to.you said b4 we was lucky to have such generations but this can't be just luck,it is a systemic success .now something in our system /organization isn't working as it is used to be
There are 2 options:
1. our system is guilty because we don't have as many talents as in 2006-2010
2. the other option is that our youth academy ALWAYS worked the same as today, and that years 2006-2010 were the luckiest years in Barca's but also in world's football history (in the last 25 years only Man.Utd team from late 90s and Barca from 2006-2010 had that many talents from their own youth academy)
-- so, imo, what you see today is just a usual/normal thing
-- Barca's school worked the same as today for 50 or 100 years
-- 2006-2010 generation was the best ever Barca's La Masia generation in 100 years of our history
In the end:
1. we can blame the board, loans, Eusebio and everyone
2. or we will realize over time, with a new board, new coaches, new loans, 100s of new players that the current situation is just a normal thing
Those lucky generation was an extreme luck.
Imo, people who believe that we will ever repeat such a generation like in those days are living in a delusion.
Just look at people's post.
They can't accept that those players just aren't good enough.
They always blame someone else:
1. the board
2. Eusebio
3. wrong loans, lol
4. Lucho not giving chances to awesome Deulofeu, lol etc
Anyway, I hope that we will be friends and fans here even in 2-3-5-10 years, so we will together make some stats and everything about our youth players.
Already in the next season we will get some answers whether new guys (Adama, Halilovic, Munir, Sandro, Samper, Deulofeu) are something special, or equally average players as 100s of others.
A year after that, new 2-3-5 players will come.
A year after that, we will have a new "best generation ever"
Anyway, let's see how will they develop and whether things will change with a new board/new coaches/new loans etc