We should have cut his loan short and sent him to Germany or England again.
If you send him to England or Germany, when he comes back, people will again say:
"One more wested year and a poor management by our board. Instead of sending him to La liga to learn how to play here, they are sending him into a different league."
So:
1. if you send him to England=that is a wrong decision by our stupid board
2. if you send him to a too strong La liga team=the board was stupid, he is not playing there because that team is too strong for a young player currently
3. if you send him to a weak La liga side=the board is stupid again. That team plays counterattacking football without any possession, and he can't learn anything there because their tactics are horrible and his teammates are just very poor, they are guilty because the player is stagnating in his development
4. if you pick a team with a bad coach, or a coach who isn't good in working with youngsters=the board made a mistake again
5. but, even if you pick a right La liga side, of the perfect strength, with a right coach and if a player plays there well and everything=some people will say: the stupid board, how are they not realizing that loans aren't working for our players?
Aynway, it is always fun to read similar topics.
Whatever the board, the coach or someone do, someone else is always guilty because our youth gem is not developing as well as expected.
Back on topic, what we would get with loaning him back to England or Germany?
Iniesta isn't at the level he used us to be but he's nothing short of shit. Come on now, do you actually believe what you're writing?
