I definitely agree that the last thing we need is the same predictability we had before. It's just that we should be more cohesive and unified in how we implement those tactics. If we need to control a game, do so with energy and a fluid team shape, not the slow and disorganized thing we've seen. If we want to play quicker, have an organized defense and keep our dynamic attackers in position to carry the ball forward or to make a deadly run rather than scattering long balls everywhere before we can actually find a quick route forward.
Tata has the ideas for change that we need. He just hasn't implemented it in a way that has the team click in all gears and where WE make the decision on how the game goes. The system implemented should be meticulous down to every last detail just like tiki taka was, only this being much more flexible and varied. Sometimes our team loses shape when in possession, meaning we rely on individual qualities rather than the connections between our players. Rid that flaw, get our players to work as a unit and move as a mass and as the game goes on we can change style to either own the ball or find their weak spots in counters. The team has to do it all together though, otherwise both methods are ineffective and we don't play as well as we can.
That's fair, my argument was that we should not be judging him on our attacking play when two of our best players had not started a game together since November and only got a consistent run of games in September, a period where we won all six of our games, scored 20 and conceded 5. And but for stupid lapses in concentration 2 or 3 of those 5 goals shouldn't even have happened.
The dimension Iniesta and Messi adds to our team when on song is so substantial that its pretty crazy that we're pulling the knives out on Tata. One of these guys is in the top 3 players of all time, the other is easily the third best player in the world when on song.
Last edited: