I already said I understand fans not liking Xavi because the style of football we played was supposedly not Barca worthy.
But I take it with a grain of salt, this supposed "we accept coming up short if we try to play good football", not a direct quote to you but this is the direction of the theory. This is a club that has a 50% ratio of winning the league title in Spain for almost 30 years.
Playing well gives everyone hope that you will get closer and closer to glory, but the goal is always to win. Whoever doesn't think so is delusional to me.
That's why you don't throw bus parades unless you win. That's the end goal and the destination, but it doesn't mean the ride to that shouldn't be as enjoyable as possible.
Hey, I wasn't really referring to you. And have seen over the months of Flick how you are balanced in your opinion of him and mellowed on the Xavi term perspective.
As you say here, we can't play good football to the complete disregard of results and finish 3rd, 4th or whatever. There obviously has to be some sort of success crossover too.
Xavi tenure was also incredibly important, and we are better today because of it no doubt. The 22/23 league win was huge and if anything, also buys time for Flick to build to the next step this year. Imagine Flick coming in and playing the same season, but without Xavi LaLiga win and no LaLiga win since Valverde. Completely different circumstance and pressures.
But winning badly is only a very short term thing to paper the cracks. As you say it is a two and a half horse race, so we need to win the league every other year or so.
But even Madrid won the league with Capello and sacked him- twice. For the perspective of also having to play somewhat well for the fans.