The only one who thinks Arthur's form is dropped is you! Why is that?
Fans who watched all matches know that he played awesome in the first few matches of a season.
And after that his level dropped to "a meh" level. He wasn't bad, but way lower the level of the first few matches.
And after that, he has barely played due to 100s of different reasons.
His good period lasted for 7 matches since Osasuna to Sevilla:
Osasuna 2:2, Valencia 5:2, Dortmund 0:0 (meh), Villareal 2:1, Getafe 2:0, Inter 2:1, Sevilla 2:0.
His meh period was: Eibar 3:0, Slavia 2:1, Levante 1:3, Celta 4:1, Atletico 1:0.
Now, look at several things, outside of subjective eye test, and even there people here said that his level has dropped:
In the first 7 matches he has:
2 goals, 3 assists, 9 key passes, 20 dribbles, 11 tackles, 3 interceptions, 3 clearances.
In the next 5 matches, when his form dropped:
0 goals, 1 assist, 2 key passes, 9 dribbles, 3 tackles, 2 interceptions, 1 clearances.
In the first 7 matches he had 51 positive contributions (as seen above).
In the next 5 matches he had 18 positive contributions.
Further, his match rating on Whoscored.
First 7 matches:
7,97
7,51
7,48
7,94
7,62
7,32
7,55
Next 5 matches:
6,87
6,95
6,22
6,79
6,89
So, his average rating on Whoscored dropped from 7,60 to 6,70.
Further, another thing:
As I have said a lot of times, it seems that Arthur's form is often influenced by his motivation and his mood.
In the last season, when he wanted to prove himself, he played well early in a season.
When he proved himself and turned into a starter, he lost motivation and dropped his form.
He was very average in the spring.
This season, he came angry and motivated because he dropped to a 5th place in a pecking order under EV.
He played like crazy in the first 5 matches, at 120% of his abilities, running up and down, assisting, shooting, scoring, making tackles left and right.
After 7 matches, he already lost a part of that anger and motivation and returned to his "normal" self.
His average rating dropped, his attacking play returned into mediocrity, his defensive game disappeared, his stamina disappeared.
About stamina, look at this:
First 7 matches:
Osasuna, subbed IN the last 37 minutes
Valencia, 73 minutes
Dortmund, 90 minutes
Villareal, 90 minutes
Getafe, 90 minutes
Inter, 90 minutes
Sevilla, 65 minutes
= played 4 matches in a row for 90 minutes (out of 70 minutes).
At Sevilla's match, he already started to be more tired.
And then look at this sample of matches:
Sevilla, 65 minutes
** Senegal, 68 minutes
** Nigeria, 80 minutes
Eibar, 71 minutes
Slavia, 84 minutes
Levante, 66 minutes
Celta, 90 minutes
Atletico, 73 minutes
= in the last 6 matches for Barca, he played only once for 90 minutes.
Another fact, with today's match against Alaves, out of the last 12 Barca's official matches, Arthur played in only 3:
Didn't play: Valladolid 5:1, Slavia 0:0, Leganes 2:1, Dortmund 3:1, Mallorca 5:2, Inter 2:1, Sociedad 2:2, Real 0:0, Alaves x:x
Played: Levante 1:3, Celta 4:1, Atletico 1:0
So, I have found another pattern on Barcaforum:
1. we knew before that every player is worth based on how he has played in the last game. If he was good=he is awesome. If he was bad=sell.
2. but here is another pattern: each player has his pros and cons. And the longer a player doesn't play, it seems that people slowly forget player's flaws and remember only his good sides.
One Month ago, there were more people posting how Arthur is bad in the attacking part and in defending.
But now, due to not playing for some time, those flaws are forgotten and people again think only about his good sides.
3. also, another pattern is: when a player doesn't play, fans start to love him again, example:
1) when Rakitic played last season=he was shit and a cancer
2) people wanted a trio Busi-Arthur-Frenkie.
This season started, Raki was dropped.
3) suddenly people started to say that Busi is bad and how the best lineup would be "something else".
That something else was suddenly: Vidal-Arthur-Frenkie.
Then we played that way for a few matches.
But it didn't work.
4) then people moved to a new idea: Busi is so bad and Vidal is chaotic, maybe we should try: Rakitic-Arthur-Frenkie.
It was well for 2-3 matches, but after Anoeta and Classico, people want Rakitic out and now the idea is: I think that we should try ALENA-Arthur-Frenkie.
Then, when Alena will also disappoint, people will make a full 360* circle and go back: we should try Arthur-Frenkie-Busi again
So, basically:
1. when a player doesn't play, his good skills are GROWING on a forum and bad sides are disappearing
2. and also, a player who hasn't played the longest is also getting love from fans and people will, say that we need to try that combination again.
For example, we all agree that Dumbele is sloppy, weird, not too brightest etc.
But in a few weeks, people will start to miss him and say: I think that our best lineup in attack is Dembele-Suarez-Messi.
Then Dembele will suck and people will say: no, bring back Griezz-Suarez-Messi.
Then Griezz will play meh.
Then people will say: no, give a chance to Fati-Suarez-Messi.
Then Fati will be meh.
Then people will make another 360* full circle and say: no, Griezz-Suarez-Messi is the best.
So, I personally don't like these irrational patterns, so, I'll repeat:
1. in 2019, Arthur played well in January and February. Then his form dropped a lot.
2. in this season, he played good for 7 matches only in a row.
Then his form dropped a lot again.
3. even worse, he disappeared and played 3 of the last 12 matches due to various football and non-football related reasons.
So, imo, it is not fair to look only at 7 matches where a player was good and angry and where he gave 120%, because that is not a real Arthur.
If a player had 5 good matches and 5 bad matches, you can't say=he is always as good as in those 5 good matches.
The real answer is: he is good in 50% of matches and average in 50% of matches.
Now, go back and take a look at Arthur's 2019 year and count how many good weeks he had at all in Barca's shirt.
So, imo, out of desperation and since other midfield options are also bad, you guys are insanely overrating Arthur and are remembering only his good games and totally erasing other Months (or are offering insane alibies for why he was bad).
During summer we had to read how his stamina isn't bad at all and how EV is stupid. What about his stamina this season? It is gone already and a guy is only 23 years old.
Or that he was injured in a spring and this is why he played bad.
I don't think that it was an injury in the last season.
But even if it was an injury, then he missed the whole spring to one injury and now is missing for majority of time due to other random injuries.
Should I even dare to ask: is he injury prone then?
You can't have it both ways:
That he both has a good stamina and is not injury prone, yet he is missing a majority of each season and is always dead tired after 50-60 minutes of a match.