Everytime this was claimed in the past 6 years the high earners simply replaced by other high earners.
True, but that was a different board.
We have set wage limits for every new contracts, so now we are sure it isn't happening.
So not sure what are you saying here.
Which means that before June 30 there should not have been any signings if there is no green light that these can be registered. After that there is 2 months time to go through your options. I mean that much should be obvious.
The only obvious thing is this is an absolute non sense.
Even rigid rules of Liga allow you transfers no matter what if you are saving money, which we did.
The club brought a player from loan, and signed 3 free agents, which free agents was going to be available after June?!!
BBB is actually bad though. And yet these credit ratings mean basically nothing at all as 2008 has shown.
It isn't bad though, more of "Ok-ish", and what does 2008 have anything to do with current club finances that is owned by members and not stock market or real estate?
Your revenue isn't covering your expenses. So the revenue isn't the problem. It's the expenses.
Which has been lowered, and sure plenty of work need to be done there.
Fans coming back to stadium will be huge relief when it happens. Current expenses is good if it was happening before covid.
And how revenue not covering expenses means revenue isn't a problem? It means both are problems.
And now your revenue will pummel anyway. So the priority should be cost reduction asap. The squad was already competetive for top 4, it didn't require to gamble with Aguero, Depay and co for it.
So, you suggest that losing CL money is ok since revenue will decrease anyway? Gotcha
The squad was already competetive for top 4, it didn't require to gamble with Aguero, Depay and co for it.
There is very minimal gamble here. Those players are signed almost under their market value under favorable conditions.
Aguero has 1 year granted and basically on "add-ons" contract, Depay and Eric accepted lower offer than other clubs. Emerson is back from loan.
And we were closer to 4th than 2nd, now we are losing Messi we might be closer to 5th than 3rd actually. We needed reinforcement and the signings was the bar minimum.
At worst that plan also fails if noone wants to loan them, just like noone wanted to buy the deadwood..
And even if they will, the point still stands that this is a gamble and bad business.
The point doesn't stand at all, the squad needed new players, that was fact. Laporta signed the bar minimum and he opted for the best interest of the club with almost minimal risk.
It was either there was going to be exception and relief in the summer, and this is necessary investment to correct the situation of the club and improve the future (while making least convincing effort for Messi) or that was no way Liga accept relief of the rules, and in such case we can find ways to register those players to keep us at least pretenders in the league.
In both cases, this was a must do. There wasn't other options.
And please, can you enlighten me which of those players aren't transferable? Emerson? We already rejected couple of offers for him.
Eric: He already accepted a huge wage cut, after already accepting lower offer to City and others, many Liga clubs would love to have him.
Depay: Same thing, on very team friendly wage.
Aguero: The only debatable one, and even him he probably won't lose sleep if we cut him lose or waited to register him later. Not like he had any offer elsewhere.
So, basically only gamble was Aguero, and he signed for very low salary.