Messi983
Senior Member
That means nothing. It's not like that's a 24/7 job.
Gallardo has zero experience outside of South America. There is a good chance he would be another disaster. I also can't understand why are people so crazy about Ten Hag? He is managing a team in a league that's far from competitive. Except for 2018/19 season his track record is unimpressive.
IMHO none of those 2 should have an advantage over Xavi.
But what can we do IF Xavi doesn't want to come/Laporta doesn't want him. Or as said in previous post they probably both have reasons to think it's not the right time for Xavi's return.
Gallardo is proven in a bigger club/better league than Xavi. Sure, he could flop but so could Xavi. The only advantage Xavi has over him is his knowledge of the club. But as we can see with Koeman, being a legendary player doesn't mean you'll also succeed at the club as a coach. I think Xavi will be a better coach than Koeman but there is no guarantee he'll become what people expect from him. At least not in our current situation which is one of the reasons why he's staying away for now imo.
Personally I'm not extremely high on Ten Hag. I have my doubts about him but should still be an improvement over Koeman. It's more his nationality and usual Ajax-Barca connections that makes him a good candidate over what he's done so far in his coaching career. At the same, with what credentials were Koeman or Rijkaard hired? Frank even got Sparta Rotterdam relegated and was a year without a club before he got here. So from that POV even if you consider Ten Hag's track record unimpressive he's still done better than Rijkaard.