El Gato
Villarato!
I didn't say one should not do case by case examination.
Yep, heavily implied any analysis of other players sold/loaned around Zidane tenure should be treated as 'excuses' while never addressing what the arguments are, nor did you provide any analysis of your own, only the final statement pointing out youve simply inserted them into your argument as Zidane flaws without even doing due diligence.
All of the players you happened to mention have a reason why they left the club. In all but Marcelo-Reguilon case it makes sense.
I used Hakimi as a paradigmatic example of a lawful trend
Now using big words to make yourself sound smarter lol.
You present it again as Hakimi wants to play all the minutes as Madrid's starting RB. I say this is not true.
Cant claim it's not true when the only evidence we have is him leaving to a team without an established starter.
but he was 'out of Zidane's plans' as his agent confirmed.
Here you're flat out lying, he said nothing of the sort. He said he left due to Zidane decision who has an established starter in Carvajal that is a better defender than Hakimi.
I will give you that Carvahal was better defensively in 19/20, but not by a large margin.
By a huge margin. Was part of 2nd best defense in Europe this season and Achraf proved he has a lot of work just this past week where Mendy folded him and he gave an assist to Benzema through an irresponsible play.
On the contrary Hakimi is already better offensively that Carvahal based on 19/20 and he is 9 years younger.
In every metric other than goals Carvajal has the same offensive stats as Hakimi in each of the past two seasons. And that's despite playing in the worst offensive Real Madrid side in 30 years while Hakimi played in a bad league and for a run and gun offensive side who have Haaland, and who also conceded a lot.
xA (expected assists) in 18/19 and 19/20
Carvajal 3.37 and 5.44, Achraf 2.96 and 5.51
no difference between xA90
KP90 (key passes per 90)
Carvajal 1.27 and 1.39, Achraf 0.57 and 1.20
Source - understat.com
Conclusion? No, he's not better in most aspects other than goalscoring, just benefits more from a better attacking side and more organisation. In fact Carvajal is criminally underappreciated as shown by how much better and more stable RM look with him.
ATM Hakimi is a guy with an excellent motor, energy and bravery but is also unbalanced and threatening to become an inverted winger in the mold of Bale more than a defender.
Keep believing he is the man for the job, and after some years you will start counting how many years of rebuilding you will have had wasted with him (we already wasted 3 with Valverde)
Didn't argue he is.
What you say about going for him in the future after selling is nonsense. Financially suicidal.
Standard buyback type investment which has been done for decades, last time with Morata. As Achraf contract winds down we should be able to go back for him and get him below 80 meaning we'll pay 40 for a made player and it's not even certain he will be as he has a lot to prove defensively.
Why should i justify anything about Odriozola??
We are talking about Zidane not counting on Hakimi.
Nope we're talking about shaping a squad considering you need to concern yourself with the wage ladder and what you're going to do with other players. There was no buyer for the #2 player and Hakimi wanted to play more minutes than he knew he would have gotten provided Carvajal is as good offensively and better defensively than him.
That's just two of the factors that meant him staying unfeasible. Plus Hakimi would need a new big contract as his old one was expiring in 2022.
Don't try to present it as purely financial issue, which is not.
I didn't. Been trying to show you the amount of variables you're ignoring all along. Read again.
Last edited: