Givenchy's statements here can be summarized in this template:
"Messi's the GOAT but he's the worst A, B, C, D...Z".
You clearly don't believe he's the GOAT, dawg. I mean you've pointed out that he's a terrible leader, lazy, money and power hungry at various points in the last 30 days in this thread. How do those traits add up to GOAT by your own calculations. So, stop this charade. There's no need to qualify your criticism with that first phrase as if that grants your remaining argument any sort of extra validity or immunity from backlash.
I'd much rather the criticism be like Serghei who's critique is consistent with where he ranks Messi (as one of the greats and none of the GOAT business).