Lionel Messi - v7

DonAK

President of FC Barcelona
Without Messi and with Valverde in charge? No way we would've won it just by replacing Messi. But with a better manager and without Messi we would have more chances than with Messi, these tactics and Valverde around.

I mean with a better manager with Messi we would have great chances as well.

I think the guy who made that comment meant simply switching Messi with CR, while retaining Valverde and these same tactics we would be Champions League winners.
 

serghei

Senior Member
I mean with a better manager with Messi we would have great chances as well.

I think the guy who made that comment meant simply switching Messi with CR, while retaining Valverde and these same tactics we would be Champions League winners.

Sure, Messi is not an obstacle in winning the Champions League, but he is also not this incredible advantage like it is often implied here, so incredible that it hides important flaws. It really doesn't. There are more important things you need to have, which are bigger than Messi, to win the CL. As long as we don't have those, having Messi doesn't mean much in the context of winning the CL.
 

Batistuta9

New member
I don't know how messi will perform this year, but how he performed last year was a massive advantage in the CL for barca. Its just a shame that suarez/dembele are useless in CL and our midfield and defence are useless against decent opposition. If he wasn't a big advantage for barca, there is no way this team ever get near the semis. He was still the best in the world last year
 

snowy

Well-known member
Did he score hattricks away vs top teams like Juve, Atletico 2 times, Liverpool, Roma? 0 goals, 0 assists in those games. So, in these infamous defeats, the reality is that his lack of movement and effort hurt the team much more than his genius helped it.

Considering we scored 0 ZERO goals and received buckets.

Messi hasn't made a real difference away from home in CL in the big games in ages.

Why? Because his movement is shit, positioning is crap and his leader qualities are missing. Talent without work and hunger to win can only take you so far. That is what's wrong with Messi.

Can you honestly blame him though when the bucket loads of chances he created were not converted by his m8s?
Lack of hunger? Dude, he and Vidal could've eaten a whale at Anfield. He really gave it his all but Klopp completely neutered our MF.

Mov shit pos crap... well maybe Messi who's been playing at the highest level for years actually has a deeper understanding of the game than armchair tacticians who've read a few juega de posicion theory books don't? hehe Just maybe ;) or maybe ask the Pot-man here who also played the game at top level.

About the leadership thing, WTF??? He was channeling Ghandi and his non-violent civil protest the parts when he was immobile on the field that you criticise. Yuk yuk ok just kidding here but dunno how many of you guys play competitive sports. I play wopo and things get pretty chaotic in the water, yet our captain is even quieter than Leo. We call him "monk" and we joked if it were any of us assuming the role, even the water would run out the pool

Man, if I had the chance to play with Messi. I'd be so psyched I'd run around like the Tasmanian devil :lol:

if Barca players need someone to shout at them, means they've got no fire and it's time to retire and sip some martinis. Just sayin xD
 

DonAK

President of FC Barcelona
Sure, Messi is not an obstacle in winning the Champions League, but he is also not this incredible advantage like it is often implied here, so incredible that it hides important flaws. It really doesn't. There are more important things you need to have, which are bigger than Messi, to win the CL. As long as we don't have those, having Messi doesn't mean much in the context of winning the CL.

It was an incredible advantage last season and the only reason we could have and should have won the SF and probably the Final.

I'm not sure how motivated he'll be in the KO stages this season, but last season he really gave everything he could, pressing, movement wise, home and away at Anfield, and what happened? The midfield and defence shat itself while Alba and Suarez missed two decent chances served by him.

Sure, his CL performances the years before that were disappointing, but I'm sure not having to carry the dead corpse of Luis Suarez would help as well as a decent manager.
 

khaled_a_d

Senior Member
Funny how they never talk shit about Valverde's favorites aka the veterans who are the actual problem with the squad.

They are the ones who complained about them before anyone. And everybody was mad that we are talking about the team best players.

Considering Messi literally carried this team to a Semi-Final in the CL last year and should have reached the final where we surely would have won vs fucking Tottenham, it's insane to say we would have won it with some other player instead of him.

And yes, I know some people want to argue against the term 'carrying the team', but Messi carried the team last year, in fact he's been carrying the team for the last couple of years in the Champions League

[tw]1187106445902450688[/tw]

Despite everything said Messi is still the best player in the team.
But last year we had luck tbh. We had great group stage tbh and done well against both inferior sides we faced (Lyon and Manu) and he was surely difference maker against the later.
But against Liverpool we were Lucky in 1st round (and carried by Messi too) but not so much in away game as usual.

Also: "without Messi" doesn't mean we will replace him with vacuum.
We will need at least 2 world class attackers to replace him.
If we switch the attack line of Barca and Liverpool we will look better most likely. But those are 3 WC players replacing the best player in the world.
There is nothing to make us feel sure we will get anywhere near such an attack in the future.
Who knows, may be Pedri will be next Neymar and Fati the next Henry and we will have good thing in the future. But ton of things has to go right for such things to happen.
 

JohnN

Senior Member
Last year was a great example of one man carrying the team, so yes, he gave as an unfair advantage. It's not bad to admit something now and then. Everybody admits his workrate off the ball is not great. But Sergei, even though you are a nice poster, you really come off as having an agenda about Messi.
 

Juan Shoe

New member
If having Messi isn't an advantage for Barca, offer him to every other team in the CL and see how many want him.

Having the best player is clearly an advantage, how you use him determines how much of an advantage.
 

Riordon

New member
Also: "without Messi" doesn't mean we will replace him with vacuum.
We will need at least 2 world class attackers to replace him.
If we switch the attack line of Barca and Liverpool we will look better most likely. But those are 3 WC players replacing the best player in the world.
There is nothing to make us feel sure we will get anywhere near such an attack in the future.
Who knows, may be Pedri will be next Neymar and Fati the next Henry and we will have good thing in the future. But ton of things has to go right for such things to happen.

With Liverpools attacking lineup, I'm sure we would win back2back CL's. The sporting department play a huge role in this failure. Liverpool's frontline is brought with a system in mind, they all have specific roles. Again what was the point of Griezmann? The point of Coutinho? They just seem to buy the best players at the big clubs without thinking which players would fit together. But again this is also difficult for our sporting department with all this "can he play with Messi", "messi would love him" and so on. All of our attacking players bar Griezmann must adapt their game to Messi's and this is also difficult. I don't believe guys like Salah and Sterling would look good here due to him.

Im looking forward to the day where we have competent and professionals as the recruitment team instead of former players so Barto can win some face.
 
Last edited:

Batistuta9

New member
I don't believe we win back to back CL's if we had Liverpool's front 3,more is needed. Their defence and midfield is better than ours, yet they just about got past us. Maybe we would have won last year if we had their defence, who knows.

I don't see anything wrong when recruiting players, to see if they will fit with messi. He is the best player in our team, we could buy anyone in the world and he would still be the best player on the team.
 

Mitchell1978

Senior Member
I don't see anything wrong when recruiting players, to see if they will fit with messi.

Barça don't do that either, if they did they wouldn't have bought Griezmann whose best position is very similar to Messi (and i disagree Griezmann is a 9 like some people think here).

The reality is that barça's board don't have much of a sporting project its all about maximising the brand not winning, also the reason why there have been 2 foreign tours in preseason.
Imo the board is even a bigger problem then the coach.
 

Batistuta9

New member
Barça don't do that either, if they did they wouldn't have bought Griezmann whose best position is very similar to Messi (and i disagree Griezmann is a 9 like some people think here).

100% agree. I was always against the griezmann signing because his best position is similar to messi. But now we have him, the only way he can play with messi is as a 9 because he is ineffective as a LW.
 

BBZ8800

Senior Member
People are posting shit about Suarez all the time.
How he has scored a low amount of goals in a CL.
Or even better, how he can't score away from home.
But let's do the same about Messi.
I'll add a new additional stat: Messi's goals AWAY FROM Camp Nou and when a pressure is ON (Ko matches), since it is a known thing that Messi has issues with matches away from home and when things go bad.
So, what we can see, this can't be blamed on Valverde for example. Or on Rakitic. (As if: Messi can't score due to EV and his shitty tactics. Or Messi can't score because our midfield with Rakitic can't create anything).
The thing is, if we want to dig a little deeper at Messi's carrer and how he scores, when he scores, and when he goes MIA and sulking, there is a clear pattern:
2014:
City 2:0, 1 goal (pen)
Atletico 0:1, --

2015:
City 2:1, --
Psg 3:1, --
Bayern 2:3, --
Final: Juve 3:2, --

2016:
Arsenal 2:0, 2 goals (1 pen)
Atletico 0:2, --

2017:
Psg 0:4, --
Juve 0:3, --

2018:
Chelsea 1:1, 1 goal
Roma 0:3, --

2019:
Lyon 0:0, --
Man. Utd 1:0, --
Liverpool 0:4, --

So, in the last 15 KO matches AWAY from Camp Nou, he managed to score 4 goals. But 2 of them were penaldos.
So, he was able to GET into a chance on his own and actually score a goal from an open play ONLY in 2 matches: vs Chelsea 1:1 in 2018 and Arsenal 2:0 2016.
And even then, against Chelsea, that goal was a gifted goal, a mistake and a counter around their box.
A goal against Arsenal was another counter, when he was 1 vs 1 keeper in the box.

** Also, I would add one thing:
Messi is perfect in some areas, but very flawed in other areas.
And then, against weaker opponents, he is still too good for them, that he is able to dominate inspite of his flaws.
But when he plays in a team which is not perfect, or when he plays against very good opponents, and/or when he plays AWAY from Camp Nou in any KO Matches=then he is usually EASY to stop/neutralize by good teams and he is usually invisible, walking and sulking. And his teams (Barca and Argentina) are usually always losing in the same manner.

So, what is my point?
1. well, Messi is kinda slowish in the last 5 years.
He is short, and that means that he can't win aerial battles like CR7 and we can't play crosses for him.
Since he is slowish, that means that we can't play counters except in rare cases where he is totally unmarked like against Arsenal.
That means that with a current Messi, aged around 30, you can play only in one way: a granny slow, sterile, possession game around the box, with 100s passes aimed at him and hoping that he will finally dribble past 4 players and produce magic.
And yet, as seen in the last 5-6 years in a CL: Atletico 1:0, Atletico 2:0, Psg 4:0, Juve 3:0, Roma 3:0, Liverpool 4:0=that isn't happening.
Messi is still the best and lethal when he gets the ball around the box and when he can shoot or has only 1 defender on his back.
But those kind of situations are happening ONLY in La Liga against Mickey Mouse teams who can't cope with Messi.
Or in a CL matches at Camp Nou, where all the opponents are frightened by 100 000 fans and by a crazy atmosphere.
Also, Messi is relaxed and confident at Camp Nou and plays to his best.
Yet, when we play in a CL KO matches away from home: Messi is not confident. If we concede a goal, he is losing his head. He is walking, sulking, without confidence.
Then when you mix Messi without confidence with his physical attributes where he is slow, short, not pressing, not moving off the ball=you get the same old story all the time. We can't do shit, he is neutralized easily, a team doesn't know what else to do than to pass to Messi and we lose 3:0 more or less to any decent team. Since 2014'.

Should I even dare to mention that Messi had exactly the same pattern for 15 years in an NT team, where he:
1. is scoring for fun in qualifying matches (when there is no SUDDEN DEATH pressure)
2. and how he is scoring in a group stage, where again: the opponents are weaker and there is no SUDDEN DEATH

But once when NT team KO matches starts, iirc: Messi has ZERO Goals in his career in all KO matches on World cups and Copa America.
People will again offer an alibi=but Argentina is shit.
But still, if he is STILL such an advantage in big matches, he should be able to create magic on his own here and there, even with average teammates.

So, what do we have in the last 5-6 years with Messi in KO matches?
1. 15 away KO matches with Barca, scored goals on 2 nights. Wasn't able to score on 13 nights.
2. in an NT team, played around 10-ish KO matches in that time. Zero goals.
That means that in the last 5-6-7 years, he had 25 important KO matches AWAY from home, and he was able to score 2 goals from an open play (and even then, one of those goals was a gift from Chelsea).
Now, when the best player in the world scores 1 true goal in 25 KO matches, you need to raise some questions.
(Please guys, don't offer another fanboy alibi: football is more than goals or stats, lol. Since he isn't doing too much in other areas also on away matches, if you consider his GOAT status.)

My theory is, as explained above, that he is bad in away KO matches due to a mix of:
1. he lost motivation in the last few years, he is a father and a family man
2. he is mentally fragile and he loses it easily on away matches in a CL when things start to go wrong
3. he is slowish, short and doesn't move off the ball=which makes him easy to stop and mark. (Unlike hated CR7 who can still get into chances both after possession and after crosses with his aerial strength due to: better motivation, more pace, more stamina, being tall and moving better off the ball to get into chances).
4. of course, Barca isn't perfect anymore, a coach is bad, Argentina is meh... but still, his physical skills and his lack of movement/motivation are also a huge part of a reason for their failures.
Especially since those teams are built around Messi, and those teams don't know how to play without Messi.
And then when Atletico, Juve or Liverpool mark and neutralize Messi, we are dead.

So, some used an answer: but we are even more shit without him.
Well, yes.
I have already wrote:
1. without Messi, we will be 4th in La Liga
2. with Messi, we will be top 2, but we probably won't win a CL as long as he is a key man who plays in a centre, marked by 3-4 players in the middle and as long as he won't move off the ball. And since he is 32, that ship has sailed. He won't change his game.
3. our game could reach a new level of teamplay and Total football (like Ajax) only when we will turn the page and start from zero in post Messi era.

** Btw, I did say a year ago that Messi is both a huge gift and a burden for this team.
A lot of users laughed at me and asked: Bbz, do you know a meaning of a word "burden"?
Well, yes. I do.
Messi is a burden in terms that we will never have a teamplay like Ajax or Liverpool as long as he is here, since all the balls need to be passed to him.
And since he doesn't move and is neutralized easily.

So, our current state is: we suck without Messi.
And we can't win a CL with a current old Messi as a key man.

** But as we see currently, people are already pointing fingers, calling some of us: not real Barca's fans, ungrateful, CR7 lovers etc.
On the other hand, why not accept the obvious?
1. Messi was the best player ever, but even in his prime: he had some flaws. But then his good sides were stronger than today, plus he was surrounded by Xavi-Iniesta and coached by Pep.
2. without Xavi-Iniesta and Pep, he lost a lot.
Also, in the last few years, he aged like everyone, and his bad sides are bigger than 10 years ago, and his good side is way less alien-ish than 5-10 years ago.

I mean, should we pretend until the age 38 that Messi is perfect, that he is by far the best, and that everyone else are always a reason for our defeats.
EV is guilty.
Raki has his share of blame.
Busi also.
Suarez also.
Alba also.
Defense also.
Mats also.
Messi also.

This Messi's thread is another example why I don't like simple solutions and scapegoating, when people said:
Remove Raki and we will fly again, lol.
If you remove Raki, we will still have Busi, who is bad.
If you remove Raki, you will still have Suarez, who is bad.
If you remove Raki, Busi and Suarez, you will still have an old Messi who doesn't move off the ball.
If you remove Raki, Busi, Suarez, Messi, then Dembele will still be dumb.
If you remove even Dembele, Pique will still be old and prone to errors and Lenglet will be average.
If you remove EV, Raki, Busi, Suarez, Messi, Dembele, Pique, Lenglet, then Semedo will still be bad in the attacking third and Alba will be a liability in defense in CL matches.
If you remove Semedo and Alba... well, then you removed almost the whole team and then we will have 100s of new similar problems with new guys.

In short: we have 100s of problems on 100s of levels.
Messi is ALSO one of them.
Of course, EV, Raki and Suarez are bigger problems, but still, we won't get too far after 2020 with Messi as a key player.
He will be 33, deal with it, guys.

100% agree. I was always against the griezmann signing because his best position is similar to messi. But now we have him, the only way he can play with messi is as a 9 because he is ineffective as a LW.

Another slow attacker. Similar to Messi.
Griezmann will be easily neutralized by any top team since he is also slow, he is meh in the air, and he can't dribble at all.
So, Messi-Griezz attack against Liverpool and similar teams?
I guess that we will lose 0:5 this time with even worse displays...
 
Last edited:

JohnN

Senior Member
Age is non debatable. What I would like to point out though is this. You can't say that we would be 4th in la Liga without him, but he is a problem in away cl knockouts. We would be even worse without him there too. There is no reason we wouldn't be. Our sulking away at KOs is a freaking mystery that goes back many years.
We can't score at all there. Also no one else scores, which is absurd. If we think about it, the seasons we actually won, other people also scored crucial goals. Messi was the same. The others did better.
If we put all our hopes on one player, we will always feel he let us down. It's unfair and has never been done before,about any other guy.
 

Batistuta9

New member
People are posting shit about Suarez all the time.

People post shit about Suarez because that's what he is and has been for the last couple of years. I remember when he first joined people were comparing to R9. But 2 or 3 CL goals in 2 years as a 9 is pathetic.

Yes, messi is not as good as he was in his prime, to think that is delusional. But we were so close to winning last year, that if he had a bit more help we could have easily won. To say we never won because of this version of messi is unfair.
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top