Daniele
Member
You claimed media opinion is the most credible. I disagree but either way Ronaldo was voted ahead of Messi in four of last five years when take into widespread media opinion.
If same Guradian article voted Ronaldo ahead of Messi you would ignore it.
As said you just pick one that agrees and decide they are most credible.
There is zero logic in attributing art historians to football media vs those involved in football. The fact you think that is logical is enough for me to not even bother to labour on that one.
I can support it... Balondor is media driven. Three in last four seasons Ronaldo voted ahead of Messi. This season in FIFA vote media voted him ahead again.
ahah seriously??
I read the Guardian since many years and I like its ranking (the one drawn up by numerous journalists at the end of the year since 2012).
I find them competent and inspiring.
I no longer know in what language to write it:
I don't give a damn fuck about Messi vs Ronaldo. I don't even dislike Ronaldo, I don't understand why you keep mentioning this question.
The fact that football critics have to vote, footballers play football and coaches coach opens up quite self-evident to me.