Marc Cucurella

Tackle

Senior Member
Huge money.

But I don't get City here.
Since someone else was willing to pay that money, you are gonna lose the player in the end.
They seem too concerned with what has been said about them (overspending, oil money, etc) and trying to sell high and buy low this summer.
Weird moves TBH

Manchester City have usually not regretted backing off a deal due to wage/transfer fee that does not fit their structure. Partly the reason they have very few true flops.
 

khaled_a_d

Senior Member
Was always my favourite LB that came out of La Masia. Always thought he was better than Grimaldo, Miranda & Balde (currently).

Still don't get why he was always a thought after in Barca board and with even La Masia fanatics.

Big challenge ahead of him though.
 

Birdy

Senior Member
Manchester City have usually not regretted backing off a deal due to wage/transfer fee that does not fit their structure. Partly the reason they have very few true flops.

Not really.
In the past they overpaid for many, and some of them flopped.

Jury is still out on Grealish, but keep in mind they paid 120m euros
Ake might have flopped for 45m
Stones might have flopped for 55m
Mendy certainly flopped for close to 60m

and if you go further back in time,
Otamendi for 45m?
Mangala for 45m (!) ???

They have certainly overspent for players whose returns on the pitch are at least questionable
 

Birdy

Senior Member
BTW:

Brighton will buy that Colwill kid for 20-25m pounds.
That means Chelsea swapped and paid close to 30m for Cucurella.
Not as bad as people think
 

Tackle

Senior Member
Not really.
In the past they overpaid for many, and some of them flopped.

Jury is still out on Grealish, but keep in mind they paid 120m euros
Ake might have flopped for 45m
Stones might have flopped for 55m
Mendy certainly flopped for close to 60m

and if you go further back in time,
Otamendi for 45m?
Mangala for 45m (!) ???

They have certainly overspent for players whose returns on the pitch are at least questionable

Since Pep took over, they replaced their entire squad apart from KDB, spent around 2 billion euros and there are only a handful of players you can come up with that were objectively poor signings.

Otamendi and Managala were pre-Pep. Grealish might be the biggest blunder of them lot. Mendy had his career derailed due to off pitch scandals and injuries, looked very talented when fit and playing. Stones did a decent enough job, Danilo can be singled out as a much poorer use of funds.

Consider the business of clubs like Barca, United, Chelsea etc. in the past 5 years and City are leagues above.
 

Birdy

Senior Member
Since Pep took over, they replaced their entire squad apart from KDB, spent around 2 billion euros and there are only a handful of players you can come up with that were objectively poor signings.

Otamendi and Managala were pre-Pep. Grealish might be the biggest blunder of them lot. Mendy had his career derailed due to off pitch scandals and injuries, looked very talented when fit and playing. Stones did a decent enough job, Danilo can be singled out as a much poorer use of funds.

Consider the business of clubs like Barca, United, Chelsea etc. in the past 5 years and City are leagues above.

Didn't object to that last part.
I was talking about the valuations of some players they paid for.
Many of them you can rightfully say they overpaid for given what they returned on the pitch.
And that's not a dig on Pep, refers more to the City board that was there before Pep.

Now, I am saying maybe the criticism towards their spending grew on them, and they are trying to change their skin this window.
Sold Zichenko, Jesus, Sterling for good money, might do the same with Bernardo to us.
But trying to buy low and not many to replace the above players.
They lost out on their prime LB target, and there is no one with his profile and PL experience available. While we know they had the money to get him
Seems odd to me
 

Respekt_III

Anti-everything
They've walked away from a few deals where the player goes above their valuation. There's more to it than just paying the fee eg future negotiating positions with other clubs imposing a city tax on players. Similar to Liverpool they often don't exceed what they value a player at. They might also have potential b teamers who might be able to Fill that void or may have other targets.

Was absolute stupidity what they valued and paid for Grealish though, guys an absolute drop kick.
 
Last edited:

Messi983

Senior Member
Activate 4th lever and buy Cucu for 60m.

Activate 5th lever and send another FU letter to Chelsea, United and all EPL fans/pundits.
 

Devils

Senior Member
I refuse to believe this guy is actually worth that much. Haven't watched him at Brighton but no way did he become that good lol.
 

Porque

Senior Member
City are rumoured to be spending 80m on Gvardiola, so Pep will pay if he really rates a player- or if the players surname is close to his.
 

Bobo32

Senior Member
Yeah always thought this player was OK-goodish, but these values are surely PL inflated. He could have been of a lot of use as Alba replacement/rotation the last few years I am sure, and also as LW or even LCD, especially in a back 3.

A shame that so many la masia players are proving themselves elsewhere, rather than getting the chance to do so at Camp Nou.
 

Andresito

Senior Member
Staff member
Will be interesting to see if the stubborn Lucho will budge on his Alba/Alonso LB selection for the NT until Qatar. Surely a 60m rated player should take a spot ahead of at least Alonso for Spain. So far he has 0 call-ups with likes of Gaya and Reguilon being preferred until now.
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top