Ousmane Dembélé

Status
Not open for further replies.
Total-Football

Total-Football

Senior Member
Imagine if we weren't thrifty with psg when dimaria was close to us 3 years ago.. A winger with balls and vertical style who goes at defenders.. Instead we put ourself in debt to sign this bum
 
Messigician

Messigician

Senior Member
Total-Football said:
Imagine if we weren't thrifty with psg when dimaria was close to us 3 years ago.. A winger with balls and vertical style who goes at defenders.. Instead we put ourself in debt to sign this bum
Click to expand...

I mean it wasn't that, we just weren't that interested in him as people thought he was a dumb footballer, I've always rated him and one of the few who wanted him here
 
Respekt_III

Respekt_III

Anti-everything
Total-Football said:
Imagine if we weren't thrifty with psg when dimaria was close to us 3 years ago.. A winger with balls and vertical style who goes at defenders.. Instead we put ourself in debt to sign this bum
Click to expand...

Neymar money paid for him so no.

Messigician said:
I mean it wasn't that, we just weren't that interested in him as people thought he was a dumb footballer, I've always rated him and one of the few who wanted him here
Click to expand...

It was more so he's very inconsistent more than anything.
 
Last edited:
serghei

serghei

Senior Member
Luftstalag14 said:
Actually, by saying "black people can't be racist" I believe there are two undercurrents: (1) The belief that black people have always been victims of racism so they can't be racist themselves. Of course this is not true. People of every race, ethnic group can be racist against another race or ethnic group, this is a human characteristic not limited to certain races and groups only. (2) I have seen some people, presumably non-black, saying this and I think their intent was a very racist one: Black people are in the bottom of the barrel so how can they look down upon other people? This is derogatory and total BS of course.
Click to expand...

Spot on. And the bolded part is one of the fundamental problems with woke culture.
 
serghei

serghei

Senior Member
Laplacian said:
(2) is only partially correct.

People are referring to the wide encompassing effects of racism, not individual racism. Black people can induce racial prejudice on others ( physically attacking someone due to racism, using racial slurs etc) everyone agrees on that. The difference is, that racist beliefs held by black people doesn't hold any real power in comparison to say white people. That is white people do not and cannot experience cultural, infrastructural, and societal disadvantages due to racist beliefs held by black people; specifically because black people are at the bottom of the social totem pole in the United States, and that in comparison to white people they hold no real power at all. This is the original (and true) talking point from academic research that has been diluted by idiotic alt-right simpletons like Gnidi because their little brains got so fixated by the words "black people", "can't be", and "racism."

No one actually thinks black people are physically incapable of withholding racist beliefs. Of course it's a lot easier to get enraged and attack a dumb strawman argument, than it is to attack a fact supported by 500 years of history.
Click to expand...

I see, so your beef is basically with the evolution of life that made white people the predominant skin-color category in the most developed countries.

The only reason why black people's racism doesn't produce an institutional effect as much is purely due to history and evolution (and the law of probability basically). There's no reason to believe that if black racist people would be in a position of power more often this will not lead to "institutional racism" as you call it. It would 100% will. Racism is racism, there's no difference if it's a black person or a white person in question. Whether it is institutional or individual is simply a matter of chance and opportunity. A racist person would not be able to make the distinction between personal life, and professional life. They will carry this discrimination in their decision-making, and policy, and whatnot.

Life is not fair in a lot of situations.

Europe is the oldest continent, and most Europeans are white. Look it up, it's a matter of evolution, there are scientific studies done about this. At first, Europeans were dark-skinned, but the genes favoring pale skin were perpetuated due to being better suited to the European climate.
 
Last edited:
ryuken

ryuken

Senior Member
Is there any way that we can get rid of this chnt and all of his bs. Man got injured again and probably laughing inside while we continue to pay for yet another one of his vacation
 
X

xxxxxx

Senior Member
Messigician said:
�� [Okdiario] | Antoine Griezmann and Ousmane Demb?l? have now been transfer-listed as Bar?a seek to sell both French attackers to clear room for Messi's new contract ageement https://t.co/khD0F0vRxT
Click to expand...

We won't be able to get rid of him whilst he's injured. No team is going to want to sign an injured player when they can sign him for free next summer. lol
 
P

Porque

Senior Member
xxxxxx said:
We won't be able to get rid of him whilst he's injured. No team is going to want to sign an injured player when they can sign him for free next summer. lol
Click to expand...

Well we need to be realistic (the club, not you). We won't get a big fee but we can probably find a buyer who are willing to pay a bargain fee now to buy him become the market is competitive next year.

I think he is injury for half the season so it is worth the advance.

If we had a good relationship with PSG then they probably would. Or an EPL club like Arsenal who would struggle to compete when clubs like Man Utd make offers (presumebly) in the summer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Home of Barca Fans

Top