Paco is not the problem. The midfield is the problem. Paco is a good 4th option in attack to have. And if we get Deulofeu back, we're set in offence. We should only be interested in upgrading our midfield, and our defense. Attack is fine.
The "Problem" is we'll have to choose between Munir and Paco. Munir is from our academy, is younger, knows our system, and is imo a better player, so while Paco may be a good 4th option, he should still probably go, because a better one is coming this summer along with Deulofeu.
The only negative is Pacos fee for a player that Lucho has not used enough to justify it.
Munir a player I didn't rate as highly as others still as more upside than paco.
But much like delou he is being player out of position.
Give Munir 1 year as a striker,paco can't touch him, he as way more in his arsenal than paco does.
Munir isnt a better player than Paco. If Suarez got injured it would not even be that close as to who would be the better CF to cover him.
Deulofeu cant play CF and has not even shown he can play as a wide player that suits Barca.
The only negative is Pacos fee for a player that Lucho has not used enough to justify it.
Paco is a good player, and is better than Munir, and has more abilities to play as a striker. He's young, and he'll help if trusted. Sociedad is a pretty good team in La Liga, and he had a very good game against them. Played well against Bilbao too on Camp Nou. If we give him balls, he will score goals and make assists, as his connection with MSN members see to be improving at a good rate.
Just keep Paco, bring back Deulofeu, and the offense is set, with MSN + Deulofeu and Paco. Plus that if we sign a very good CAM like Bernardo Silva or Coutinho, he can slot in as well in one of the forward positions. Attack is the least of our problems imo. Every signing we make needs to be in midfield and defense. Midfield is the Achille's heel atm and seriously needs fixing.
I'd like top RB, top CM, maybe an AM too, and even a CB. 4 signings, 2 in midfield, 2 in defense, out of which two players have to be close to world class level - RB and midfielder (either CM or AM).
Yea, more Enrique's fault tbh.
Munir is more clinical in front of goal. By what measurement?
Munir has played well vs Bilbao as well and he's also played well in the Barca derby which is usually a tough match as well.
Even after his dramatic rise in form last season he was loaned out, but Paco came and even now he's not as good a backup as Munir was back then and I'd go as far as to say it's not even close.
Paco is a beter finisher. He has scored quite some goals for Valencia, and was even Spain's main goalscorer in the Euro preliminaries. What has Munir done to be called a better striker than Alcacer? He isn't even a sure starter for Valencia.
Your dislike for Deulofeu is so strong you threw in some vile at him even though he's not the subject at hand here. He's coming, there's no point preaching to us how terrible a fit he is for Barca.
When I say Munir is a better player, I should have said he's better for us. He's much more familiar with the system, is at this point more clinical in front of goal (Paco's misses today were problems we were having with Munir when he was a teenager), and is one of our own Masia products, which should hold some kind of value when compared to an expensive signing who has similar quality, although I know it doesn't to you and many others.
Paco is a better back-up than Munir. But he was rarlely used, and when he was played, it was usually in experimental line-ups in which he barely had usable balls. Paco's numbers in the little minutes he got are actually pretty great.