The performance of all three forwards in the second half was 0 chances created, 1 shot, 0 goals, one CL final.
Fixed.
The performance of all three forwards in the second half was 0 chances created, 1 shot, 0 goals, one CL final.
Pedro is a wing/inside forward, not a CF #9. Pedro can sub for Neymar in the current formation with little effect on the basic tactical formation, but obviously subbing Pedro for either Suarez or Messi changes the whole system. Obviously, no bench player could replace Messi, but a #9 sub could be useful, simply to be able to keep the same tactics when Suarez is subbed out. This is why I currently favor Sandro of Barça's available options, as he plays quite well with his back to goal and can keep the CBs occupied. And his short passing is actually better than either Suarez or Neymar.
The performance in the second half is less a reflection on Pedro than it is on Suarez and the system built around him playing centrally (and the nature of the tie at that point). The performance of all three forwards in the second half was 0 chances created, 1 shot, 0 goals.
I agree with this, in hindsight I'd much prefer Sandro to have replaced Suarez, and Pedro to have come on for Neymar. That plus subbing off Iniesta for Xavi would've done it, Rakitic was rested against Real Sociedad and could play the whole game in my opinion. Putting on Mathieu for Rakitic and moving Mascherano up to play a double pivot was a blunder in my opinion.
At any rate, the game is past us and we went ahead to the finals, and I'm sure Lucho learned his lessons from this one as well. He's still a young coach.
Edit: By the way, doesn't that last driblerun and pass to Messi from Neymar even count as a chance?
We need to keep Pedro and buy a good decent bench CF.
We will be fucked if we lose Pedro AND have to find two forwards.
[tw]599375005605089281[/tw]