M
messi_xavi_iniesta
Guest
It´s useless to talk about falcao at barça. Impossible. Tito does not want him and he´s to expensive.
CB is number one need.
CB is number one need.
It´s useless to talk about falcao at barça. Impossible. Tito does not want him and he´s to expensive.
CB is number one need.
Yes, because our forwards are scoring like crazy, what need do we have for the best striker on the planet???
Because we would be bringing him to do the same thing Eto did for us a couple of years back, which is to score goals, press the opponent's defense and create space for the rest of the team.
We create more goalscoring chances than any other team in the world, having someone other than Messi who can convert them just make us less reliant on Messi for goals; and having someone with pace and positional sense upfront can benefit Messi by opening gaps for him. If you want an approximate illustration of what I'm saying you can go back to one of the Classico games of last season when we played Alexis in front Messi.
Muller is another option IMO, but as I mentioned less realistic.
You do realize that forwards not scoring does not equal the team not scoring, right? Our midfielders are all more than capable of scoring (especially Fabregas and Iniesta) and our fullbacks are good at putting it in the net as well. Not to mention that Villa has the second-most goals for the team, with five.
As long as Messi is given the priority that he is (which isn't a bad idea at all with the way he's playing), Falcao at Barca wouldn't perform like Falcao at Chelsea or Madrid-sans-Ronaldo.
given our current situation id take a good cb over falcao any day. we've conceded too many goals this season. and we've only failed to score once. defense is a priority at the moment.
Sure, the team might perform better overall, but neither Messi and Falcao would perform at their 100% best. That's all I'm saying, really. In other words, Messi would not break Muller's record if accommodations are made for Falcao to perform at his best, and Falcao wouldn't annihilate Athletic, Chelsea, or score 5 in a game if Messi is accommodated as he is now. Why hinder the best player in the world when you can find other solutions and keep Messi at his best?
So are you telling me that if Atleti had Messi on the pitch against Chelsea, Bilbao and Depor they would have had more difficulties?
And why would we care so much about Messi scoring 90 goals per season? Sure he can get by with 70 and also have Falcao score 40 or something like that. The point being, that Barca as a team would much more formidable with both Messi and Falcao on the pitch. And that is all that matters if you want the best for your team.
Wow, you're quite good at twisting words. Who mentioned anything about Messi with Atletico?
Falcao is at his best when he's the main man. Bring him alongside Messi and he'd underperform or have a hard time playing to his true potential, unless you take Messi back to the wings. Which would hurt Messi's performance. Falcao can't be just a direct replacement to Villa or Pedro, as he can't play on the wings.
Because Messi on the wings or as a classic #10 isn't the same as Messi as a false-9 with all the freedom in the world.