You can sweet talk every transfer like that, raed. Every young player has a sort of potential and there will always be competition.I do not know why Cules are arguing the ten million for Canales. While the ten million may seem a lot for unproven player, there is no reason to suggest that our scouts have not been seen potential especially that Portugal is one of our own works with him.
While our behavior with our very own Cantera is poor when it comes to the first team, that does not mean we do not have top notch scouts and/or trainers.
While you may consider that we paid 5 million extra on a player on the verge of breaking through, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that we would have perhaps needed to pay another ten had he proven himself for a season and there has been competition ...
I really do like him. No doubt about that, even he plays for Real (unless he transforms into a cocky sonofabitch) I think he might be one of the more neutral Madridplayers around if he stays with you.He insisted on signing a contract for Racing to compensate his club for coaching him K it was his decision (and his father ) not Racing brilliance, it's not like any of those new young boys who would be happy to be a free agent to take the signing on fee in his pocket.
a very level headed and loyal lad
You can sweet talk every transfer like that, raed. Every young player has a sort of potential and there will always be competition.
But this is potential of another kind imo. The Canales kid hasn't even played a full game with Racing! His longest run on the pitch was versus Sevilla, 78 minutes, in 13 appearances. And I stay with my assessment: the only thing why he got big is because he scored those goals in Sevilla and the media went completely nuts. Even Revista came with "a new superstar in La Liga is born."
If 10 million for Canales is a doable fee, a thought through proposal, then so is 25 million for a UEFA Cup winning defender that was selected for best UEFA Eleven XI and 35 million for a French striker that had a super season and has the composure to score vs United. But everyone thought that was way too much.
No doubt Canales can become a good player, and I would have liked him at Barcelona, but not for 10 million. And on the other hand, if your scouts were that good, they would have targetted and signed him before the media went nuts and everyone got acquainted with the Canales hype. Cause you know, everyone knew he was a free agent before his scoring spree versus Sevilla and Espanyol. Certainly with your main man Portugal as his coach.
I know, which is why I mention it. Benzema actually has something to back up his transfer fee (to a certain extent if you wish to be critical), so if you buy a youngster that has nothing to show except a limited number of minutes for 10 mil, why not buy the french pichichi for 35?He may have been on Real Madrid's radar for a long time, no one will know. You cannot say that the only reason we bought him was because he scored two goals, how do you know? Fact of the matter is that with young players it is evident that they have potential but then it boils down to one factor, who has the guts to take their chances?
Of all the other players, he did. We love players like him, ones who grab life by the horn and make the best of it.
In the next year, he will get to work on his consistenc because there is no doubt in my mind that he will go for long periods of time without performing, and then rising to stardom and then back to under-performing. Except, it would not be at Madrid, so he will not be burnt.
As for Benziza, you know damn well how much every single Madridista hates that transfer. Absolutely garbage.
actually Barça tried to sign him at age 12 and 16..... just throwing in my 2 cents