Real Madrid (old thread)

[AnfieldEd]

Your worst nightmares will come true

 

[gvt2000]

GVT we can debate forever about the value of Eto'o in the eyes of people , those who consider him worth 1$ or those who consider him worth 30 Mil (City bid ) or those who consider him worth 20 Mil (Barca commentator in the Ibra presentation ) ..etc at the end if everyone is happy so be it it will always be a subject of debate between fans

our debate is you can see here is different , As u see we are debating basic financial concepts here

however saying that Barca received money for him is wrong , or trying to deduct Eto'o value from Ibra transfer is
and assets = money Ry , YOU MUST PUT IT AS MONEY in your books
and u consider the depreciations value as well which in that case we made Eto'o value as low as 20 Mil (or whatever) instead being on par with Ibra or others

What im saying is Barcelona payed 49 million CASH. If barcelona had a 100 million transfer budget, you would not deduct 69 million, you'd deduct 49.

 

[Beast]

What im saying is Barcelona payed 49 million CASH. If barcelona had a 100 million transfer budget, you would not deduct 69 million, you'd deduct 49.

in terms of cash yes , in terms of value/deductions made /offer made no

U have two deductions not one

1- deduction in cash 49 Mil
2- deduction in players asset by Eto'o

u know like the old PES system or any football game .. money + Player = a certain value

 

[gvt2000]

in terms of cash yes , in terms of value/deductions made no

U have two deductions not one

1- deduction in cash 49 Mil
2- deduction in players asset by Eto'o

u know like the old PES system or any football game .. money + Player = a certain value

Yes i know what you're saying, and indeed Ibra's total value is that of cash + asset. No arguments there. I haven't said otherwise. what im arguing is the cash spent and how much Etoo was really worth. Its an endless discussion. In my eyes, etoo had no monetary value, given that the only club offering cash was M.City, a club etoo refused to join.

 

[AnfieldEd]

In monetary terms Barca paid 49m euros plus included eto'o in the deal

Eto'o is valued at 20m euros

Inter did not pay 20m euros for eto'o as eto'o was included in the zlatan transfer

Barcelona received no monetary fee for eto'o but were willing to give up a monetary fee for zlatan's services.

Tell me if I am right or wrong so far?!

 

[Beast]

Your worst nightmares will come true

keep Rafa away from us

 

[AnfieldEd]

Nah

 

[Beast]

In monetary terms Barca paid 49m euros plus included eto'o in the deal

Eto'o is valued at 20m euros

Inter did not pay 20m euros for eto'o as eto'o was included in the zlatan transfer

Barcelona received no monetary fee for eto'o but were willing to give up a monetary fee for zlatan's services.

Tell me if I am right or wrong so far?!

Yes..you are 100 % correct

 

[Fourteen]

Erm...Isnt that what Gneg was saying?

 

[Beast]

Erm...Isnt that what Gneg was saying?

No Gneg was trying to deduct the 20 Million value of Eto'o from Zlatan fee and from Barca overall spending as if Inter paid money to sign him

 

[AnfieldEd]

I thought it was obvious Inter paid no money to Barca?

 

[Fourteen]

Well then that would have made it 29 million, which he didn't say....

 

[Beast]

Well then that would have made it 29 million, which he didn't say....

My god...

really ,you lot need to stay away from any financial jobs, MBA,managerial jobs for good


Zlatan transfer value is 70

Gneg was trying to make it 50 after deduction the 20 Mil received from Eto'o value

clearer now ?

 

[Beast]

I thought it was obvious Inter paid no money to Barca?

Not according to the couple of financial geniuses we have

 

[AnfieldEd]

That is why there was so much uproar throughout europe when zlatan was valued at 70m euros!! which I still find incredible as his true value is nearer 30m euros imho.