Real Madrid (old thread)

[Cule Angles]

 

[Moe]

Using your numbers:
If we spend 116, then you spend 250.
If you spend 170, then we spend 96.

As accurate as it gets..

 

[Gnegneri]

Feck, I think all those spends should have ended with a -t, no?

 

[Beast]

No, you said we spend 116 while you don't take "Eto'o's" value from that while you do that for Real. It's unbalanced. It's not correct.


Using your numbers:
If we spend 116, then you spend 250.
If you spend 170, then we spend 96.

Jesus are you for Real ?

Real received that money , Barca received nothing
Eto'o value is added to your spending he was used as PLUS money .. instead of 70 u paid 49 + Eto'o , so why you want to deduct him

beginning to think Cule's are really crap @ math

or late night decrease the level of IQ dramatically

stop acting stupid Kev .. stick to Ronaldo memorial photoshop arty00231:

 

[Gnegneri]

So Zlatan is 70 mil (round it) and Eto'o is 20 mil, Ronaldo is 96 and Robben is 26 to make it easy to process.


I say:
We buy Zlatan for 70 and we sell Eto'o for 20 = 50 million.
You buy Ronaldo for 96 and you sell Robben for 26 = 70 million.
You spent 70 while we spent 50.

You say:
We buy Zlatan for 46 + Eto'o (valued at 20) = 70 million
You buy Ronaldo for 96 and you sell Robben for 26 = 70 million
You spent 70 and we spent 70.


Hence, you deduct your sold player (in this case Robben) but don't deduct our sold player (in this case Eto'o).

Someone's wrong. And it is not me.


Remark: This is not my evaluation of Eto'o in the deal

 

[Cule Angles]

No point in this Gneg, the whole forum knows Beast can't count

 

[Metaphysical]

we paid inter €45m for zlatan.

that's it.

think about it like this:

beast and I are sitting in the park at 9pm, and I have a tuna sandwich, and beast has a bottle of water. beast is really hungry and I am not hungry at all and can't stand tuna sandwiches, and I am really thirsty and beast is kinda thirsty, but not as thirsty as he is hungry.

now I could offer beast five quid for his water, but he wants his water and the money won't sustain him as the shops are closed. however if I then offer him my sandwich, which I don't need or want, and the five quid, beast will think "fuck yeah! great deal" and take it.

now this is a great deal for beast because he gets five quid AND a sandwich that he really wants.
and it's a great deal for me because I get rid of a sandwich I didn't want and get the water that I really wanted.

also, I have only given him five quid. the sandwich has great value to beast, but almost none to me because I didn't want it.

kapiche?

 

[gvt2000]

Beat me to it

 

[Beast]

So Zlatan is 70 mil (round it) and Eto'o is 20 mil, Ronaldo is 96 and Robben is 26 to make it easy to process.


I say:
We buy Zlatan for 70 and we sell Eto'o for 20 = 50 million.
You buy Ronaldo for 96 and you sell Robben for 26 = 70 million.
You spent 70 while we spent 50.

You say:
We buy Zlatan for 46 + Eto'o (valued at 20) = 70 million
You buy Ronaldo for 96 and you sell Robben for 26 = 70 million
You spent 70 and we spent 70.


Hence, you deduct your sold player (in this case Robben) but don't deduct our sold player (in this case Eto'o).

Someone's wrong. And it is not me.


Remark: This is not my evaluation of Eto'o in the deal

Someone is wrong and it is you

there is NO
We buy Zlatan for 70 (that figure ALREADY INCLUDING ETO'O VALUE )and you sell Eto'o for 20

there is only you bought Zlatan for 49 plus Eto'o

i deduct my player cause Real received money in return.. Barca didn't receive anything just paid

But i like your thinking..
but shouldn't you deduct Maxwell also from Ibra value ?

anything to make Barca looks smart in the transfer ..

go back to your photoshop Kevin , you are trying to hard to pull my leg ..try to be natural next time .learn from CA or Sunny

 

[Beast]

we paid inter €45m for zlatan.

that's it.

think about it like this:

beast and I are sitting in the park at 9pm, and I have a tuna sandwich, and beast has a bottle of water. beast is really hungry and I am not hungry at all and can't stand tuna sandwiches, and I am really thirsty and beast is kinda thirsty, but not as thirsty as he is hungry.

now I could offer beast five quid for his water, but he wants his water and the money won't sustain him as the shops are closed. however if I then offer him my sandwich, which I don't need or want, and the five quid, beast will think "fuck yeah! great deal" and take it.

now this is a great deal for beast because he gets five quid AND a sandwich that he really wants.
and it's a great deal for me because I get rid of a sandwich I didn't want and get the water that I really wanted.

also, I have only given him five quid. the sandwich has great value to beast, but almost none to me because I didn't want it.

kapiche?

Unless your sandwich , your 5 quid and bottle of water belong to a company , firm, club
has it's value and not your own to give away ...
that's where your analogy is wrong in Eto'o case , like anything belong to Barca (all players , all hardware ) he has his value and has records for him

 

[silky_soccer]

Cool, cheers for the info beast..

in a way im kind of sad, because how good wouuld it be if it was a Classico CL final? :O
at the bernabau aswell, it would be mouthwatering,

Act well, another year maybe..

 

[Gnegneri]

Someone is wrong and it is you

there is NO
We buy Zlatan for 70 (that figure ALREADY INCLUDING ETO'O VALUE )and you sell Eto'o for 20

there is only you bought Zlatan for 49 plus Eto'o

i deduct my player cause Real received money in return.. Barca didn't receive anything just paid

But i like your thinking..
but shouldn't you deduct Maxwell also from Ibra value ?

anything to make Barca looks smart in the transfer ..

go back to your photoshop Kevin , you are trying to hard to pull my leg ..try to be natural next time .learn from CA or Sunny

Look, you start making me doubt my own calculations so I put them nice and clean:

What is wrong with that?

 

[House of Flies]

i am loving the maths in this section.

 

[Beast]

Look, you start making me doubt my own calculations so I put them nice and clean:

What is wrong with that?

Hope to god you are not working in anything related to finance otherwise Belgium is screwed
Very simple in a yes or no

in table 1
- did u receive money for Eto'o? no
- than the 20 Mil is non existing and already you valued Zlatan with 70 so u used Eto'o in column A as payment(part of the 70 Mil value for Zlat) not received money u cannot use him twice
in Table 2
- Did Zlatan cost 50 ? no he cost 50 + 20 Eto'o value
- table is in correct
table 3
that's what you paid and what your accounting department will show

pretty simple , now you know what jobs to avoid

 

[Beast]

Cool, cheers for the info beast..

in a way im kind of sad, because how good wouuld it be if it was a Classico CL final? :O
at the bernabau aswell, it would be mouthwatering,

Act well, another year maybe..

You are welcome Silky

well we met couple of times in the CL , you were the first team in the history of Europe to stop and defeat Real Madrid with Di Stefano after 5 years and i think u know the recent one in early 2000

def another year :beer2: