Bobo32
Senior Member
Yeah it?s real.
Here?s one from the press conference after the game:
Wow, he IS a big boy now
OK, this confirms my observation that you live in your dream-land. Don't take it personally, I don't want to offend you, there is no more polite way to put this.
But it explains why you are so sold on Xavi, who at best will try to replicate Pep's tiki-taka without realizing that a decade has passed since then.
No firm grounding on reality is the greatest recipe for disaster, and that's a reason Xavi should stay away from Barca until he baptizes himself well enough in the wild world of European football, and proves that he can get rid of his dogmatism and adapt his principles to current to-date football.
Everything in sport and in nature in general shall be constantly renewed or else it dies out.
Pep himself, presented the last 1.5 years the most defensive and cynical version of his football, because he knows that, and he is constantly adapting or else he would not be winning anything.
Look at the fate of poor Mourinho who is climbing down level after level, because he just cannot adapt.
Could Pep's tiki taka survicve after 2012 as it was played until then?
Probably no, and we saw that already with Tito, who was a big advocate, a pupil of Pep, and continued on the same lines.
Bayern thrashing was a rude awakening.
Then after some experimentation, Lucho was the one to find some sustainable way of playing that does not violate the values and principles of this club, but can be effective as well on the top level.
So, your revisionist reading of those years (until before EV to say the least) is totally off. What would have happened if your proposal was adopted, would be a steady and constant decline on the top of Tito's season on the same fashion, with the same weaknesses being exposed easier and easier. And the waste of Messi's years would be even worse than what you can imagine
You don't offend me, I think as little of your views to be perfectly honest. Your posts about xG and Koeman being great in the last days seems completely ridiculous to me, as seems this discussion about managers needing to prove themselves (exemplified with Flick, ten Hag and Pep...)
You don't answer my questions though, that's the one thing that is a bit rude.
I asked you to show what coaches were a success to Barcelona that were proven beforehand.
Pep is adapting and winning, and he is playing all the time true to his vision and in a way approved by Bobo32. He said the other day that you can't separate off/def and this point I agree with.
Tito was dying but I think he would be great if he could've lived and managed Barcelona for a few more years.
Enrique tweaked the system and managed to sneak a treble with the best trio ever. He was a disaster for Barcelona in the long run.
Last edited: