Saul Niguez

[te amo barca]

Gini >> Saul

bollocks

 

[HanDW]

Both mid.

 

[serghei]

Saul is better than Gini because he is considerably younger.

 

[Kul_z]

Gini >> Saul

Same brackett. Gini's advantage is playing under klopp system. Neither of them are tier 1, but saul is 26, so yeah, id like to see a mf trio of 26, 24 and 18, its been awhile since we had youth in mf. Tired of 30+ mf.

 

[shockey80]

Saul is better than Gini because he is considerably younger.

Depends on what the objective is. To be elite for the next couple of years, while Messi is still great? Then Its Gini

 

[FC433]

Roberto for Saul seems fair Can cover their RB position as well.

 

[Zidane82]

Roberto for Saul seems fair Can cover their RB position as well.

They apparently quoted us 95 million for Saul so I do not see them going for Roberto

 

[malvolio]

His agent didn't reject the notion that he might join us. All he said is that Saul is keeping his options open.

 

[psychotsek]

Pedro,FDJ and Saul starting sounds better than Dembele,Griez,Coutinho on the bench.

 

[Birdy]

Saul is better than Gini because he is considerably younger.

In no possible world, the above sentence is true.

Younger does not mean anything if you can't cross the threshold of necessary quality.
It's funny how this forum keeps disrespecting and underrating Wijnaldum, even after the theashing he saved for us at Anfield in 2019.

PS:
The detachment from reality is evident in those who think Saul-Pedri-FDJ is something possible to see.
You will never see that in any competitive game, and the reasons are obvious.

 

[serghei]

In no possible world, the above sentence is true.

Younger does not mean anything if you can't cross the threshold of necessary quality.
It's funny how this forum keeps disrespecting and underrating Wijnaldum, even after the theashing he saved for us at Anfield in 2019.

PS:
The detachment from reality is evident in those who think Saul-Pedri-FDJ is something possible to see.
You will never see that in any competitive game, and the reasons are obvious.

This is not 2019 anymore. Wijnaldum was great on a free. Saul is a better player because unlike Winaldum he is in his prime. At the same age, I take Wijnaldum. Not when he's 4 years older and we're looking to rebuild.

 

[Birdy]

But his prime is nowhere near the quality we need.
Hence, it's irrelevant if he is in his prime or not

 

[serghei]

But his prime is nowhere near the quality we need.
Hence, it's irrelevant if he is in his prime or not

Sure, Kante is the quality we need. Saul is the quality we can afford and is a good player.

 

[Birdy]

Sure, Kante is the quality we need. Saul is the quality we can afford and is a good player.

WE can afford many qualities what we don't need.
If we don't need them, why afford them?

 

[serghei]

WE can afford many qualities what we don't need.
If we don't need them, why afford them?

We need Saul. Not badly, but he'll probably improve our midfield. We could finally move Busi into a part-time role.