D
DavidVilla
Guest
Shearer was better than Villa though.
Yes and Paul Gascoigne was better than Maradona.
You are by no means English are you?
Shearer was better than Villa though.
What the hell? Do you suffer from chronic paranoia?
These are the sort of pointless discussions brought up in an thinly veiled attempt to boost one player over another or to undercut the most successful central midfielder in generations...Scholes was great, he's a United legend but it's the sort of English drivel of hyping their stars that nauseate me...Nevermind that they are two very different players, what criteria would be used to even compare them?...Goals?...Big deal, Xavi isn't a goalscorer...Passing, vision & assists?...It's like the a 'cold night in Stoke' argument with English fans...Pumping players from a bygone era, it's like a desperate attempt to maintain some relevancy when Spanish football rules the planet
And no, I don't hate United, I despise fluffing English footy
Xavi -
"In the last 15 to 20 years the best central midfielder that I have seen - the most complete - is Scholes," he said.
"I have spoken with Xabi Alonso about this many times. Scholes is a spectacular player who has everything.
"He can play the final pass, he can score, he is strong, he never gets knocked off the ball and he doesn’t give possession away. If he had been Spanish then maybe he would have been valued more."
Xavi -
"In the last 15 to 20 years the best central midfielder that I have seen - the most complete - is Scholes," he said.
"I have spoken with Xabi Alonso about this many times. Scholes is a spectacular player who has everything.
"He can play the final pass, he can score, he is strong, he never gets knocked off the ball and he doesn’t give possession away. If he had been Spanish then maybe he would have been valued more."
Shearer at Barca would have scored an absolute shed load.