D
Dundalis
Guest
Fair enough. When I said the height makes him have more potential, I was meaning that Coates can basically do most or everything else that Jones can do just as well. Hence the all things being equal comment. But of course Jones can't grow so he likely won't have the ability to be as dominant in the air as Coates.I shouldn't have said pace, I guess. that wasn't what I mean. I'm well aware there are 6'5 people who are extremely athletic. but defenders of Cannavaro's technique and drive are almost never that big. that's not to say everyone who's 6'5 is Ryan Shawcross, but you can't just say "all things being equal" because they never are.
and I'm no midget.
I've seen more of Coates than you have, but that's got nothing to do with anything. you kept saying it had been proven he was as good as/better than Jones with the ball. and you didn't prove anything. you just said it had been proven. I don't know if that video was supposed to be proof or not...
ANYWAY: the genesis of this argument was someone rambling that Coates was already better than Jones based on a quote from some douchebag journo. I disputed this, because there's no way he's as accomplished and the talent difference is edged by Jones as well. so now the arguments changed to he has greater potential than Jones despite being older, less accomplished and, let's face it, at a worse club that's less proven at developing young talent (especially defenders). and the reason for his greater potential? he's taller. I mean you'd think a forum full of Barcelona fans, having seen the 5'9 Mascherano excel at CB against bigger opponents, would know that size really isn't everything. I mean didn't the 6'1 Wes Brown manhandle the 6'5 Andy Carroll? I'm sure last season I saw the 6'2 Vidic destroy the 6'7 Crouch in the air?
and to get it straight; I'm a massive fan of Coates. I knew he was good, but the way he stepped up at the Copa was just superb. I was suggesting that, next summer, we buy him to be the future of our defence along with Piqué (although frankly, the way things are looking, that may be Mascherano in the short-term).
Agger's 26. Jones is 19.
Piqué's better than Jones with the ball, too. but he's 24 so I didn't see the point bringing him up.
Emile Heskey once played up-front for Liverpool. so that means Luis Suarez can't be an incisive finisher, right?
come on, now.
very nice.
While I was no fan of the Henderson purchase, I have however since changed my mind. I'm not sure he is worth 20 mill, but he just looks like a player that doesn't yet have confidence in his ability. I think he's got almost as much ability as Gerrard, but unfortunately none of the confidence or aggression. He's quick, has got technique, good passer, and intelligent tactically. Dalglish will obviously be tasked with bringing that out of him.that's the benefit of buying young players. even if you overpay, time is on your side and improvement is possible.
we're all laughing at Kenny right now, but Henderson has plenty of time to improve and justify his fee.
I mean, I don't think he will, and we should all laugh at Kenny repeatedly for spending that kind of money on such a duffer, but it's clearly a long-term signing.
Apart from his constant injuries, Agger has done fairly well as a cultured CB. If Coates plays with him, I don't see why he couldn't do the same. In any case Coates isn't aggressive like Lugano, he's more about good positioning and anticipation. He's not going to be another Lugano.You are a United fan.
Hey, nothing wrong with that, to each their own. Nobody's perfect!
Anyway, it looks like Coates is a Liverpool player. Too bad, I guess when he stagnates because he's taught to do nothing but make reckless tackles to fit in the EPL, Uruguay's best hope for Lugano 2 is going to be Polenta.