So Thiago moves on the midfield options will be -
Busquets, Song, Xavi, Iniesta, Cesc, Roberto at a push Messi, Mascherano and Neymar could cover the more defensive and attacking roles if required.
That is still by far the best in the world and Song looked good once he got used to things.
Not so much worried about losing him in terms of drop in quality but annoying other teams get a bargain like that.
That is 5 players for 3 position and a youngster who isn't anything close to being a Barca first team material (he isn't even our best midfield player in Barca B,Rafina has been much better last year yet he is the one loaned)
Also we lack of depth in both Defense and Attack ,we have been actually using Midfield players to cover the other 2 lines for 2 seasons now ,doing the opposite now?come on
in Attack we have : Neymar,Messi,Sanchez (he should leave btw ),Pedro ,Tello ,5 players covering 3 positions ,considering Villa is set to leave and Deulofeu is going on loan
Defense? we need 2CBs and we want to sign only 1 ,and the top priority right now is injury prone Agger? with Puyol not getting any younger ,Bartra possible loaning (never mind that he isn't that good anyway )
The team will once again have a lack of Depth ,and we btw ,Xavi has been declining last season and there is no reason with his age not to expect more drop of his form, Thiago was supposed to be the one developing to replace him,there will be drop in quality in midfield next year ,we already had a drop in the midfield performance last year and moving your young talented midfield won't help
That'd be as rash a decision as Thiago leaving so early. This wasn't handled well but cut them some slack. Thiago being so upset as to leave over one season came as a surprise to everyone. So much so that not playing him for a few more games led to him being able to leave for a mere 18m soon after.
The fact that we allowed him to have such a low buyout alone should make the management understand there is something wrong ,I mean I can understand his agent forcing such a clause but it should have been between 25-25 not 18M??!!! and btw 1 year ago Keita had used same clause and that was the main reason we opted for Song over a CB as we felt a replacement for Keita is important so we tried to cover 2 positions with 1 players(and proven wrong with Song inability to play in CB)
Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy??? This is such a bad decision, I can't believe this is happening. Horrible management.
He will get more money,more playing time ,in a club that is also one of the elite ,what is there not to like for him? I mean I want him to stay and I think it could eventually be the right decision for his career ,but I can really understand why he would leave ,kid could have left us for free when he was 16 (had offers from the EPL big clubs,just like Cesc and decided to stay) , have been patient until he was in the first team ,but now with a coah that doesn't seem to really value him ,with the management doesn't even trying that hard to keep him ,why he should be loyal? Loyalty goes both way and he has every right to leave
and that in the only season that he is going to be in control of his future btw