JamDav1982
Senior Member
Interesting how the refs opinions and rules are different from country to country.
Head of Croatian refs who was in a tv studio said it is not a pen.
Also, before a pen, Perisic took a shot, it was deflected to a corner.
Croatian players asked for a corner and talked to the ref, while Martinez played a fast counter which resulted in a questionable pen.
As I have said a few days, has it ever happened in a modern World Cup or CL history in high stakes matches like semis or finals that the bigger/richer/more influental team got robbed or not given 50:50 decisions in their favor?
Absolutely never a similar shit could happen against favored teams.
Argies Gk literally said to Van Gaal: I fucked you twice and dancing infront of him.
If someone from Plzen did that to let's say Real Madrid, a player would get a red and a 3 match ban right away.
Why did Dumfries get a red and Argies players haven't?
I know why. Do the maths. Messi, Psg, Qatar, Fifa + fans from India and Bangladesh will buy million Messi and Cr7 shirts.
Argies have got 3 pens on this Wc at 0:0.
Interesting.
If France reaches a final, that will be the first match where Argies won't be pushed by refs if needed since France is as equally as important to Fifa&Qatar so there won't be soft pens at 0:0.
Dear old rigged Wc and CL, it was nice.
Why bother watching and playing at all, to some extent?
Well not surprising if Croatian ref doesnt think it was pen but majority of others seem to think was clear cut.
Stop with your inane fix theories.
This doesnt fit and vast majority say it was clear pen.
All pens Argies have got were pens.. interesting indeed.
Your desperate theories are not based on fact.
You point to SA pen.. not to goal that seemingly was onside?
Not to ref adding on ten mins v NL etc.