2. The argument was about sums paid for players as transfer fees. Top players of a good age are almost never out of contract. Old players, sure, they can be out of contract (especially if they want a 3-year contract extension, and they are 33-35 already). But good players, that play at a good level and have a good age, you need to pay big money to sign them. In this key area, Barcelona is at the level of Nottingham Forrest. There's nothing to agree and disagree with. Just accept, and consider it, or continue to be ignorant about it.
3. EPL is a stronger league than La Liga. But the teams in EPL are far stronger financially. They are not more competitive just like that, by being better managed, as some posters around here think. In football, miracles are super-rare. EPL teams are richer, afford better players than some Almeria or Getafe. This doesn't make La Liga shit. It's the 2nd best league easily. In fact, it's the opposite. Judging by the money available for EPL teams comparative to La Liga sides, it's super-impressive a team like Sevilla humiliated Manchester United in Europa League.
4. The sofascore stat that has us 1st in big chances created probably has a mechanism for considering what is a big chance. You can take a look at xG stats in our games this season if you want. There's no doubt that Barcelona creates many chances to score in almost every game. Sure, there are some bad games here and there, like vs Alaves, where the team plays poorly. But in most games, the team has created many chances. It is visible with the naked eye even. Vs Valencia and Girona, the team created enough chances to score about 8-9 goals. They scored 3. Instead of 6 points, they got 1. That's the main issue this season.
2. Point here is that you’re using our low ridiculous transfer budget to justify our atrocious football under Xavi. This metric, however, doesn’t reflect the quality of our squad. Does Nohtingham Forrest have top players at its disposal? TS, Christensen, Kounde, Canceló, Pedri, Gavi, De Jong, ,Gündogan, Lewa, Felix, and Raphinha? Hence why it’s a silly comparison!
I am countering your argument by highlighting that the club found other ways of bringing in top players despite La Liga’s ridiculous FFP restrictions. This has resulted in us having a damn good squad!
Besides, clubs like Girona spent 27,240,000 euro on wages in 2023. We spent 204,710,000 euro in 2023. Yet Girona play a hell of a lot better than us! Why is that, Serghei? Why is AV playing better football than Man U, consistently?
So no… I don’t feel sorry for us, and our current squad is certainly not to blame.
3. Nothing to argue about here. I mostly agree, although a club cannot spend its way out of poor management. Manchester United is an excellent example of this. Chelsea too!
Similarly, a club shouldn’t even try to spend its way out of poor management! One can dress a turd in an expensive tuxedo. He is still a turd in a tuxedo. Hence, Xavi (Oscar) do not need better players! They need better management skills. This is obvious from how we play. Jeez!
Leadership > players. But it’s a combination of the two, of course.
Shot out to Unai Emery. Shot out to Michel. Very average squads. Beautiful results. I respect that.
4. I don’t trust stats generated by AI. More specifically, stats may indicate one thing when my eyes tell a completely different story. Wasteful, disorganized, unattractive style, slow, predictable…. And if management isn’t responsible for how we play, then who is? It all falls back on Xavi!
His vision is on display every week for everyone to see. All I see is nepotism! We cannot just throw money at a problem when the leadership and vision is inferior.
My point from point 4 above still stands.