BBZ8800
Senior Member
BBZ you say 'anything can be drawn from stats' then go on to say they prove what you think.
Neymar is far from a poor passer he is a very good passer and keeps ball well.
Also I dont need you to try and validate where I am right and wrong. Thanks anyway.
You always do that.
Again, let's say it this way:
1. stats in general can show a lot of things
-- and can be very valuable
-- for example:
= if it is raining in London for 300 days in a year (example) (over the sample of 100 years), then you know that it rains a lot there
-- but a reply from a random dude:
= how he was in London 10 times, and it never rained while he was there, so something must be wrong
-- lol, his stats are misleading and he is looking only at smaller samples which can have strange/random/misleading results
So, a post from that dude in a local papers:
= how in London is probably always sunny because it was always sunny while he was there, is not a good example of how to use stats
-- and it shows how you can use them to fit your argument sometimes
But because of those examples, it would be stupid to say: we shouldn't use any stats then.
No, you can use stats if you are looking at LARGER samples, a lot of variables, the whole context of every stat etc.
So, again:
-- a stat with passes from Ney to Suarez and Messi=is how we should not use stats
But:
= that stat, plus 3-4-5 other stats (posted later by Anguy for example), and some logic and context like:
= Roberto will have a higher % of successful passes than Ney because he plays passes in less dangerous area to his teammates who are close to him
-- but Ney and Messi should have a similar amount of passes because they play on a similar positions, and if those two have a huge difference in a number of assists per Season=well, then we are improving in this analysis (and we are using the stats in a good way then, if we are looking to a lot of factors, if we add the context and some logic)
Last edited: