That golden era idea is false when you look at the way Pep approached la masia when he didnt think any of the defenders were ready.
I mean the first team was in a golden generation. Pique, Puyol, Mascherano, Abidal, etc. made it to where we really didn't need to call up any defenders, although Pep did still call random kids up from time to time in easier matches. Bartra got a few good minutes in early copa rounds, iirc.
Defenders that were playing at a higher level than some of the players people want given a chance today.
Just a sign that times are changing really. Our quality has unfortunately gone down and so too must our standards.
Samper didnt look ready for step up at all and although Gomes not been good enough it doesnt change that.
I disagree that Samper didn't look ready. He could have easily filled the role of a Denis or a Gomes. He was probably not going to walk into an automatic role as a backup but he'd have been better off growing into the team slowly than wasting a season at Granada. It's not like we as a club are averse to having squad players who aren't getting as many minutes as they'd prefer.
The two players Lucho did try to promote that were average in Munir and Sandro folk by and large just moaned about them and the state of the squad anyway.
Munir was more or less promoted directly from Juvenil A and Sandro imo was never going to be ready for promotion. It's pretty understandable that they'd come out average at first but I think both of them are doing okay at this point, a few years later.
1-Gomes was signed because he had proved himself somewhere else,in a bigger club than Granada, proved himself enough to have Barca,Juve & RM going after him
2-Gomes right now is a player who is under contract at Barca. Samper is a player under contract at Barca. What was paid for Gomes has been already paid, I want this team to win and play great football. I don't care about the whole La Masia fetish people have. If we La Masia get us gr8 players like Iniesta and Messi it is great,if we sign young professional player (16 or more) like Puyol,Munir and Busquets it is as great. But I won't root for a player over another just because he is from La Masia
Gomes hadn't proven anything prior to coming here. He was never great for neither Valencia nor Portugal. He was pursued and signed based more on potential than anything else and even after his terrible displays started and continued on and on that potential was the main thing his defenders argued in favor of until even that fizzled out. How can you say you want the team to win and play great football but Gomes is the complete antithesis of that and has proven so this entire season. Him starting big games for us as he has been can't possibly help us win more than letting Samper be a backup and ease into the team.
We still have one of the top team in the world, we tried to promote players at every single era,it was a matter of player quality that made the difference.
Let me rephrase it, Samper hasn't proved he is worth changing plans for, when we sell Van Bommel to make chance for Iniesta, it was because Iniesta earned it, when we sold Yaya to make roomfor Busquets,it was because Busquets has earned it. Samper hasn't earned the right to kick any player for him. niether his performance with Barca B nor his performance with Granada say that,if he came and proved he deserves a place then it will be made for him. Right now to just loan a player like Gomes to make room for Samper shouldn't be the case.
Gomes isn't Van Bommel or Yaya Toure, he's Chygrynski in midfield form. We wouldn't be booting a class player from his perch to make way for a top young talent, we'd be getting rid of a player who is very much a cancer to the team to give younger blood a chance to cultivate. I also don't know why you're arguing against a loan, I'd much rather see Gomes be sold, even if for a loss, which is what I'm fully expecting. I'm just of the mindset that if a loan is really the only thing the club can do (Highly doubt it), that him leaving would be better than him staying.
Chygrynskiy was sold for 15M, he was worse than Gomes, less hyped than him, was actually more costly for a player of his position at that era. He is the only player that is comparable to Gomes from all the examples of Barca flops. Barto himself said we are going young to be able to get refund from our players. We weren't able t do that when we are trying to offload players at their late 20's. Gomes is 23. And again,what is gonna happen isn't our discussion,it is what should happen.
Okay? Not sure what your point even is here or what it has to do with the Gomes/Samper debate.
at this point, you're simply the anti-lucho. he would avoid giving minutes to a la masia youngster at all costs while you'd have us only playing la masia at all costs.
And you're someone who doesn't know a damn thing about me or my posting habits to make such nonsensical statements. I advocate for the use of La Masia in exactly three positions. RB, CM (backup), and forward (backup). Positions that are all hurting us quite badly this season. Positions that could have been filled, entirely for free, instead of spending nearly 70m on backups who did just as bad a job or worse than said free players.
Why are you even discussing a loan? Do you guys know who his agent is? There is no way Mendes would let Gomes go on loan. Either he stays here for another season and prove his worth to the team next year which I think will happen or we'll sell him for 25-30M. He's still young and even if he doesn't fit here there is no doubt in my mind that he can be a very good player in other big clubs.
I'd much prefer he gets sold, I'm not sure I was ever arguing in favor of a loan, I just want Gomes gone at all costs.
Another question. I wonder how many people would call out our stupid board for NOT BUYING Gomes last summer for "only 35M" if he'd go to Madrid or Juve and play good/great for them (which could happen for all we know) and we'd still have problems in our midfield because of Lucho's "no-midfield tactics" which made even our proven midfielders like Busi, Iniesta and Rakitić uncomfortable and not playing on their expected level for most of the season.
What if Adama ended up going to PSG instead of the EPL and became top goal scorer and lead PSG to their first ever CL victory (Which could happen for all we know)? Everyone would be all over Lucho for not even giving him a chance!
I get the false equivalency you're trying to make with Kroos but just like Adama obviously isn't in the same category as Gomes, Gomes obviously isn't in the same class as someone like Kroos.