If the same would be true for Messi, everyone would have agreed that Messi was great last season. I mean, 44 goals and +10 assist is statistically better than almost any of the greatest player's best season, yet everyone say that Messi was bad.
Nobody said Messi had a bad season, and if they did you shouldn't be listening to them. Most people say Messi had a bad season by his standards, and it was levelled against Ronaldo too at the end of 12/13 season when he ended up with 55 goals and 12 assists. In both cases, if they had played the exact same way and their respective teams had won trophies, most people would be singing a different tune. Such is human nature.
Regarding the MVP. Messi had a better WC than C.Ronaldo had a euro in 2012, yet people seems to think that C.ronaldo had a great euro while Messi a bad WC. And don't give me that BS about C.ronaldo having worse teammates. Atleast his teammates created chances for him. Remember the Portugal vs Denmark game? In just that one game, his teammates created more chances for him than Di Maria & co created for Messi at this WC..
What people are you talking to? Who says Messi had a bad World Cup, most people I know only dispute whether he deserved the 'best player' award, they have no problems in saying he's in the top 3-4 players of the tournament. And nobody I've talked to says Ronaldo had a great Euro worthy of deserving the player of the tournament award over Iniesta/Pirlo.
Kind tough to give it to anyone else though being that James was out in the last 8 and Neymar was injured. The Germans were great but had no real stand out star.
I don't disagree with Messi getting the MVP (it was a hard choice and for me it was between Messi and Robben). I'm talking about people's perceptions and the poster's claim that if Ronaldo had done what Messi did, they would be clamoring for him to be MVP.