Elite-BkD
New member
Actually if you want to compare they're strengths and weakness, Iniesta is only slightly better at dribbling and has a more elegant style but that is purely aesthetics. Lampard and Gerrard are better at tackling, passing, finishing, awareness. But more importantly, EFFICIENCY and END PRODUCT; 20 goals a season from midfield and being able to win a game singlehandedly.
As for Fabregas he is the heartbeat of young and inexperienced side. There is only so much he can do to compete with Man U and Chelsea. As for Arsenal not winning anything?? The two teams above them Chelsea and Man Utd are the sides that have dominated Europe reaching Semi-finals of Champions league year after year. Where as Barcelona's only real competitor in the league can't even make it beyond the 1st knockout round.
Lamps & Gerrard are actually worse at tackling, it's just that they keep on losing the ball so you see them make tackles way more than Iniesta does. That fact, in addition to his superior passing and awareness, was the reason that Chelsea conceded the midfield battle against Barcelona from the start despite the fact that their lineup boasts players such as Essien, Ballack, and of course Lampard. You are right about one thing though, EFFICIENCY and END PRODUCT are definitely key, and statistics mean everything.
Lampard - 2 league titles
Gerrard - 1 Champions League trophy
Iniesta - 2 Champions League trophies, 3 league titles, 1 Uefa European Championship, 1 European Championship for each U-16 and U-19.
And as for Arsenal not winning anything...that's exactly right, they don't win anything. You're right though, they certainly do have some pretty tough competition in Chelsea and United. Hey, those were the teams Iniesta led Barcelona to beat last year to win the Champions League, right?
Last edited: