Blaugrana Bull
HiiiPoWeR
So stupid. Unbelievable.
What is hypocritical about wanting a bad thing to happen to a bad person?
A man is defined by his actions. Go figure?Please elaborate on how you got to that conclusion
There is DUI and there is what Vidal did to his vehicle with his wife sat next to him, while totally off his head on alcohol. So this is not your standard DUI.
He could have easily killed himself, his wife, another motorist, or some innocent pedestrian. Only by fate and a large slice of luck judging by the condition of his car, this didn't happen.
Does that mean that he should not be punished?
Sure, let him off with a pathetically short driving ban, so he came go and do the same again in the future. Just pray that it's not one of your loved ones that is in his firing line.
A man is defined by his actions. Go figure?
If you want to believe Vidal is thoroughly good, upstanding human being, then more fool you.
Okay, so he wasn't that far above the legal limit, I concede that. However...I think you're exaggerating, with the information you have at the moment. In USA the legal limit at some point was 0.1. Vidal had 0.12 (repots say), that's not very high.
"Judging by the condition of his car", that's not very indicative. I've seen mild accidents and the cars looked really bad. You can't tell these days, with the materials they use to make cars.
I think you're exaggerating, with the information you have at the moment. In USA the legal limit at some point was 0.1. Vidal had 0.12 (repots say), that's not very high.
"Judging by the condition of his car", that's not very indicative. I've seen mild accidents and the cars looked really bad. You can't tell these days, with the materials they use to make cars.
Okay, so he wasn't that far above the legal limit, I concede that. However...
What you need to take in to account is that footballers don't or shouldn't drink alcohol as much as the average person. Their tolerance levels aren't as high, so what may seem a relatively small amount over the legal limit, would have a bigger effect on someone that doesn't get plastered every weekend. No?
0.12 is high. Anything over the legal limit is high no matter how you put it. You're putting other people under danger and I have no sympathy for whoever drives under influence.
Lolwut? Isn't that barely a pint of beer? (maybe measurements are written differently where i live). If so, he probably got into accident more because of his naturally boisterous nature, which is often reflected by driving manners, than any influence of alcohol.0.12, that's high by any standard..
You've got me wrong. Everyone makes mistakes and depending on that mistake, they would usually be deserving of a second chance.That was not the point (and not my opinion), but you just proved mine
Everyone can be as prejudist as the level of information he/she's been fed.
My dislike of him does not influence my opinion that he should be harshly punished, because as we all know, the guy has history.
You've got me wrong. Everyone makes mistakes and depending on that mistake, they would usually be deserving of a second chance.
If it was someone like Claudio Bravo this happened to, I would still slaughter him. It would however be out of character, so a good-guy like Bravo would deserve redemption. Vidal is not a good guy (Am I wrong here?). We are all in agreement that Vidal is not a good-guy right? Has he even apologised?
Although, I admit that making the comment of wanting him to shatter his legs and never play football again was born out of my dislike of him. My dislike of him does not influence my opinion that he should be harshly punished, because as we all know, the guy has history.
If he wasn't a professional footballer, he probably would be criminal though.