ManusXavi
New member
He won't get along with Messi and Neymar. We need a striker that will accept he's on the latter stages of his career.
I see....
He won't get along with Messi and Neymar. We need a striker that will accept he's on the latter stages of his career.
Agreed. If we are in for Van Persie, we are in because he is a striker who can play a game on short notice, at this stage of his career. You don't need to build his confidence like you would do with an unexperienced forward. He has experience at playing important matches and as a result of that, he doesn't get intimidated. Experience never goes away, and players like RVP don't need the time to get used to playing at a high-level, because he's done it plenty of times in his career already.
It's the exact reason why Larsson was bought. He was considered finished, but he showed that a top footballer can still decide games without being as consistent as in his better days. So, for me we need to buy a player like RVP, who will understand that he will have a limited role, but who will also be able to step in on short notice and get the job done.
If Suarez gets injured we are exposed. Messi at CF doesn't work anymore. He himself said he needs a no9. Van Persie would be exactly the player who could step in for Suarez. We don't have that now.
Buy 1 CF, 1 CB and 1 CM. And a LB if possible. And make sure the CM has a high passing ability and can also provide defensive work. Someone that does tackiling, passes great, and runs a lot. Verratti would really be ideal in our current setup. He is the only one that thicks all the boxes.
Larsson wasn't considered finished at all back when we bought him. He was fairly old, yeah, but with the skill set he possessed, age really didn't matter too much.
But yeah, aside from that I agree with you and [MENTION=16942]BBZ8800[/MENTION]. A seasoned, proven goal scorer would do us a world of good.
I wouldn't say RVP is finished either then. He's 32, not 38.
Me neither, which is why I'd be perfectly fine with Van Persie, if he'd come on reasonable wages.
Please no Van Persie.. I hate him.
In which scenario do you see a "natural" CF getting any playing time with us?
If Suárez needs resting, Messi OR Neymar will take up his place for that one match.Resting Suarez, or him being injured/suspended. Or switching the system, a more dramatic and unlikely measure. Say if both Messi and Neymar are to be rested, injured or suspended, a 4-4-2 (diamond or normal) with Suarez and Van Persie up front is not bad at all.
Larsson wasn't considered finished at all back when we bought him. He was fairly old, yeah, but with the skill set he possessed, age really didn't matter too much.
But yeah, aside from that I agree with you and [MENTION=16942]BBZ8800[/MENTION]. A seasoned, proven goal scorer would do us a world of good.
If Suárez needs resting, Messi OR Neymar will take up his place for that one match.
Lucho would never switch to a 4-4-2.
But what good will that do? I mean, Van Persie will get less than 500 minutes per season, should his only role in our team be a sub for Suárez. He will have next to 0 match fitness everytime he comes on. That won't do us any good.Both are unnatural solutions. Messi at CF will be worse than at RW and someone like Vidal or Rafinha are not good solutions either to replace Messi in the right. So Messi as CF is not a good option, he is too valuable at RW and AM to be moved from there. Neymar as well, he is playing like a genius at LW and he should stay there, he's beginning to build a legacy at Barca in that position, so he should not move. No. IMO, the simple solution is the best. You don't change everything at 180 degrees just because Suarez can't play. You buy a sub for Suarez and everything remains the same. Van Persie or other "9" will have to try his best to do what Suarez does. Make space for others, fight-off defenders and make the most of his chances to score.