BerkeleyBernie
Senior Member
Barcelona would've won against Bayern had Cesc played (the full 90).
At the very least he's guaranteed to create chances. It was criminal how Cesc was left out.
Messi should *not* have started, but whether Cesc should have replaced him is debatable. To be frank, I think he would have been far too slow in between the lines (where Messi *should* have been playing, but was not fit enough to do so). Cesc would have been the standard choice to replace Messi, but I think Thiago would have been a better (if unorthodox) choice). He is much quicker, both on his feet and in thought.
Come to think of it, though Thiago is always brought on as a Xavi-esque defensive/distributing CM, he really should also be played in a more attacking role- the reason he isn't is because Cesc has that bench seat. Thiago would be brilliant there, and needs some match practice to gain experience in that position, should the need arise.