Mats wasn't bad for an entire half a season, he was bad for a small handfull of games and made the scapegoat for all of our defensive failings for months after that. In all those games you can only find one or two goals conceded that were the result of poor keeping from Mats.
And then you accuse others of being Bravo fanboys,smh
You're right, but dare I say that Bravo at the age of 33 has started to show signs of weakness whereas van der Sar just got better and better. It's still not comparable to Buffon as I said. You said so yourself. Bravo is a late bloomer and that can go both ways.
Buffon is an ATG and has had years of World Class brilliance and consistency. This is pure conjecture, but I think GKs with a bigger reach has an advantage over the ones who rely more on their agility like Claudio to make up for it.
Lehmann, Buffon and van der Saar all over 1,90m.
Zoff wasn't a late bloomer. He was the Italian National GK at the age of 24/25 and played for a rising team in Serie A at Napoli until his move to Juventus
_I actually put Zoff as one who started gr8 with Buffon.
_And don't you think it is way too early to talk about "started to show signs of weakness"? Bravo showed most of what people think signs of weakness (and I retain my opinion it isn't nearly as bad as MATS,but that is another boring argument) after March when his daughter was born and according to many reports it has serious health issue that his participation in Copa America was in doubt.
And can't we use same context to say that at the age of 24 many GK's who are error prone by the time they are 24 actually retain that? May be the coach prefers safer options?
Again the conversation could go both ways.And it isn't back or white as many people acts.And I would take coach and assistant opinion very seriously at the matter too.those are the ones who watch both train everyday and know more about their character and what is going on with them.
If Lucho decides to go for MATS as no 1 or even sell Bravo then he clearly sees him as future world class GK and that probably Bravo doesn't have much in tank to worth compromising it. I really respect Bravo but I would understand the decision.
But if it is the opposite then I would respect it too because it means he sees Bravo as the kind of GK who can retain his level to the age of 37+ and that MATS might not reach that level in time.
btw,I believe it will be the 1st situation and Bravo will be relegated to CL & CDR
And sure,coaches makes serious mistakes. But in majority of times they are way better judging situations than us. And so far I do think Lucho & Unzue handled the situation very well