serghei
Senior Member
While majority of 100M+ has flopped, no one arguing he is flop, but it is typical high risk high reward deal.
And I disagree with [MENTION=22241]Porque[/MENTION] that Liverpool can afford a 100M dud, they aren't owned by sugar daddy owner, they need to be ruthless in the market.
With Mane moving, Salah seems on his way out on free agency , VVD is 31, same with Thiago and most of their core is 29+ they will need to replace many players with other elite ones.
Having 100M flop sets them back massively, having 100 success ensures they are heading in right direction
True, 100m galactico type deals is not their method of action, nor the reason they reached the top, but they do have a master manager who kind of hides the downfalls of this strategy. This is Klopp we're talking about.
A player has to be an immense flop not to work under Klopp.
We'll see how it goes with them, but 100m signings are two times more worrying when they are done by dumb presidents, than at the request of one of the best managers of the last 10-15 years.
However, so far, they paid more than City, and got a lesser player. Not too impressed.
Last edited: