Erling Haaland

[Zidane82]

While Barca want to sign Haaland on a long-term deal (of at least 5 seasons), the striker is in favour of signing a short contract. [ara]

 

[Barcilliant]

While Barca want to sign Haaland on a long-term deal (of at least 5 seasons), the striker is in favour of signing a short contract. [ara]

Good idea imo. Two year contract is fine. His injuries are a concern and if we sign him it should be a short contract. If he clicks with us we can renew him.

 

[Andresito]

The amortization is going to kill us if he's signed for 2 years.

 

[DonAK]

Good idea imo. Two year contract is fine. His injuries are a concern and if we sign him it should be a short contract. If he clicks with us we can renew him.

You want to pay 75m to sign him on a two year contract?

If he want a short term contract he can go elsewhere.

 

[JamDav1982]

No chance they will sign him on a short term contract.

At best would be some kind of compromise with a relatively low release clause after 2/3 years.

 

[serghei]

By short term contract we should make it 4 years instead of the normal 5 .

 

[khaled_a_d]

No chance they will sign him on a short term contract.

At best would be some kind of compromise with a relatively low release clause after 2/3 years.

That will be my guess too

 

[Tackle]

No chance they will sign him on a short term contract.

At best would be some kind of compromise with a relatively low release clause after 2/3 years.

Would be fine with 5 year contract that includes a 150m release clause that can be activated after the 3rd season.

By that point we should have a strong team, recovered financially and some new young strikers should pop up.

 

[Barcilliant]

Three years is fine imo.

 

[messi2140]

Weekly contract. Only extend by another week if he scores a hattrick.

 

[KingLeo10]

This guy and his/his entourage's financial demands are starting to annoy me.

Messi and CR7 produced Ballon D'Ors, CL, and a couple 50 goal + seasons before they were paid crazy contracts.

 

[Andresito]

Sign for 75m for 5 years. In 2024 release clause of 100m becomes active. You taking it?

 

[serghei]

Sign for 75m for 5 years. In 2024 release clause of 100m becomes active. You taking it?

No. Apparently whole deal will be 250m with salary and commissions. Even if you get 100m back, spend 150 for two years? For what? We're not winning the CL in the next 2 years with or without Haaland.

 

[JamDav1982]

No. Apparently whole deal will be 250m with salary and commissions. Even if you get 100m back, spend 150 for two years? For what? We're not winning the CL in the next 2 years with or without Haaland.

No the whole deal is being reported as 250m if he was to sign for 5 years and including salary.

If they put in a clause for 100/150m Barca get him for two seasons and at worst make a profit on the books if he was to decide to leave.. but most likely it would be about Raiola wanting money through new contract and the fees.

 

[Andresito]

No. Apparently whole deal will be 250m with salary and commissions. Even if you get 100m back, spend 150 for two years? For what? We're not winning the CL in the next 2 years with or without Haaland.

Salary won't be paid in full if he leaves though. And reports were that his salary would increase each year.