everyone except you considers the 2009 and/or 2011 Barca teams to be in the top 5 club teams ever assembled.
Cool.
You didn't get my reply at all.
Regardless of whether I rate Barca 2009-2011 as the best team in the world or not, the point was:
We were winning everything back then, and the board estimated that there is no better players than our current guys, so the best option is to lock them with rich contracts and we'll try to rule the world for the next 10 years.
In 2011, Messi, Busi and Pique were 24, so it seemed that they will be winning CLs for the next 8-10 years easily.
If we wouldn't have won CLs in 2009 and 2011, younger guys like Busi and Pique would never get insane wages.
So, "broken" wage bill is a consequence of "too much" success, even though this sounds as a paradox.
I will pull an analogy.
If Dembele and Coutinho are earning 13M now.
Imagine if we'll win 2 CLs in a row now with those two as core players.
And now, PSG will offer 200M for each of them and wages 20M NET.
Then, to scare off Psg, and to keep those winning guys here, after two CLs, we will need to give them new contracts worth, let's say 20 or 22M NET.
Board and fans will think:
This was the only way to keep Cou and Dembele here.
We will keep them and we will keep winning for the next 5 years.
But then, if Dembele and Cou got 20M NET, other starters will also ask for better wages.
Guys like Roberto, Semedo, Mats, Lenglet, Umtiti, Arthur, Rabiot, all younger guys.
And then, in order to NOT to lose a team who won 2 CLs in a row, these guys will get higher wages, and will jump from 5M Net to 10, 13 or 15M Net per year.
Again, that was the only way to keep them here and to keep them happy.
But then, even squad players like Rafinha and whoever will be here, will also ask new wages, and a raise from 2-3M to 5M.
Fine, we'll do that also.
But then, you have another problem: we have just won 2 CLs, and Messi and Suarez are too old and are leaving.
And we are buying 2 new superstars.
And now, imagine that we are buying Sane, Mbappe, Firmino or Son.
And now, since they are coming to Barca, CL winner, and since Dembele and Coutinho already have wages 20-22M Net, and guys like Roberto have 10-12 (they also asked a raise after Cou and Dembouz)...
What do you think, will Firmino ask for only 10M Net (in that scenario) or will he ask THE SAME or even HIGHER wages than current superstars Dembele and Cou?
Imo, Firmino or new signings would ask 20-25M Net then.
And then, you have a new domino effect: if you gave 25M Net to Firmino to lure him here, now Dembele and Cou, our key players will ask 25M and not "only" 20M Net.
In order to not lose them and to keep them happy, the board will now give 25M Net to Firmino, Dembele, Cou.
But now, when they have 25M Net, other guys will ask for their raise also: Lenglet, Arthur, Semedo, Umtiti, Mats, Rabiot.
They will now ask 13-15 instead of only 10M etc.
And also, if you'll sign NEW players. Let's say a new CM. Since he knows that you gave 25M to Firmino, Dembele and Cou, a new CM will ask 15-20M Net from the start (the same as Rabiot today).
** This was a scenario?if we'll win 2 CLs in 2019 and 2020, how we would need to raise wages of all players in this domino effect.
Now, imagine if we won't win any CLs in the next 5 years.
That means that Dembele and Coutinho will stay on 13M Net.
They won't be able to ask for better wages.
If those two will stay at 13M Net, then Roberto, Mats and others won't be able to ask for better wages either.
And new signings like Firmino, won't be able to ask for 25M Net, but only 13-15M Net at max.
So, you see how winning a CL or two and not winning a CL can make a huge paradoxal consequences on our team long term.