Assuming we'd get 100m for FDJ (which I doubt) with Tebas/La Liga restrictions we could probably only re-invest around 30-40% of that directly back into the team. Which player(s) would you bring for that money that would make it worth to lose Frenkie?
I don't believe such deal is for winter, and in summer we can spend all the money we get assuming we don't suffer from loses.
And even in January, if the money helps us to avoid loss in fiscal year, it means we can re-invest in the summer. But then again I doubt he is sold in winter.
Also don't understand you here. You've claimed in the past we need to have more players in their prime years (which FDJ should enter soon) and not count that much on youngsters. Pedri is the only one of them who has a full season of first team football in him. Gavi is extra talent but could still fail potentially, Nico I don't see establishing as a future starter but could be a solid squad player too but we can't have an aging Busi and three kids as our midfield options (alongside someone like Roberto probably who also shouldn't be here beyond this season).
As I said, selling Frenkie isn't what I want, but it is something I can
understand if it happens. I am not pushing for him to be sold
Thing is, how poor are we? How much we trust our decision maker? I assume the answer to the later question is "not much"
For me, I think Frenkie is fairly easily replaceable, probably with a downgrade in same position but will be worth it if we invest the money
wisely
A guy like Kessie for example if free agent, plays same position, asking for a salary that is less than what Frenkie gets.
If we can get him and invest 40M in Adeyami and rest on DM to replace Busquets? Is it worth it for me? I would say yes
Or get Bruno Guimaraes and Laporte for FDJ?
Ideally we keep Frenkie assuming Xavi likes him, sign a guy like Caqueret to replace Busquets and build the team gradually.
And yes, Busquets and 3 kids is unacceptable.