I still stand by what I said. He's an amateur, again saved by the experience our players possess. On top of that he sub Bartra on with 5 minutes left. That's just disrespectful.
Football isn't formal logic, this "just won because of X and not Y" doesn't work. Has it ever occured to you that the experience of the players is a factor that the coach can take into account and count on too? Do you think an experienced coach would apply the same tactics and would use the same line-up if he, instead of our players, had a team of 20-year-old inexperienced youngsters at his disposal? Besides, you were complaining about him fielding Mascherano and not Bartra, now you talk about experience saving us. Surely Mascherano has the edge over Bartra in that respect? I don't agree with Bartra not starting, but you're being inconsistent and contradictory.
And how is subbing on Bartr for 5 minutes disrespectful? If he hadn't played him all match, you would have complained about him ignoring him. Seems more like you're clinging on to every tiny bit you could criticise about him for the sake of it.
And everyone who accuses Tata of having some sort of racist bias, that claim is a tad racist in itself...