Calm down, I never said he is a bad manager. He is fucking top, results and performances of his teams say it all. I just disagree he is a tactical genius, I didn't say he is tactically incompetent. There are people who can coach their teams to play flexible and free flowing football the way he can't, and Garrido showed it last night (only in the first half though). I'd say his arrogance got exposed most of all because Real players obviously weren't prepared for Villareal running rings around them.
Problem with you Mourinho fanboys is that you think he is perfect coach who does everything better than every other man in the job, so you go crazy on any sign of criticism.
What is a tactical genius in your opinion then? Give examples so we can compare.
the a huge difference between being one of the best and a genius
a genius is someone embodying exceptional intellectual ability, creativity, or originality, typically to a degree that is associated with the achievement of unprecedented insight.
i present to you
Herrera
Michels
Sebes
do not water down the term genius, a kid that gets a honours in university isn't a genius, RVN scored many goals isn't a genius
a coach that players in a very reactive manner and his yet to manages a team that really goes out their and tries to be proactive especially against good teams
who has a limit set of tactics that he uses in most games(pep too) and as add nothing revolutionary to the game is certainly not a genius.
Those coaches are considered geniuses in retrospect, when full blown analysis was conducted in order to understand what made them successful. Mourinho will be studied when his time is up, when he no longer is rallying up troops. Their careers were successful as long as they lived, it was made legendary when other adopted it and learned from it. The same is going to be said of Mourinho.
Madrid fan boys do not think he is the end all be all because he has his flaws. However he is a wonderful coach who has proved that his teams can be as versatile as they come.
Like Beast said, he may have not introduced new thesis to football but he has definitely written chapters in Catenaccio and football psychology as well as media manipulation. He is far from likable if you are at the receiving end of his abuse but consistency at which he conducts himself in this manner maintaining effectiveness is tremendous. Pep had his number in the Classico, but you are also comparing a top notch coach to him which doesn't prove anything besides the fact that Pep also managed to modernize the Barcelona game.
In 15 years when we reflect back on Mourinho's coaching ability depending on his success with Real Madrid and the team that follows, I am sure football experts will write thesis on his secrets, when players are interviewed and can be quoted. Right now, everything he says is annoying, everything he utters enrages everyone. When he is finally quite and retired, a look back on his methods will yield a positive return for football schools around the world even with all his negative manner.
After all, everybody says Herrera is a legend and a genius by looking at what he has won, forgetting his football was completely disapproved of at the time and he was the subject of trash talking by all those who were at the receiving end of his mind numbing football.