KingLeo10
Senior Member
I want to know something from users here. I know for casual football fans if argentina won that final against Germany, Messi would probably be universally regarded as the undisputed GOAT.
But for fans that have been watching him year in year out and the level he has played for such a long time. Would you rate him higher if he had a world cup to his name?
I've always rated players by how good they were on the pitch, with Messi as number 1 followed by R9.
With all due respect, just the eye test doesn't determine greatness. If so, Bergkamp would be top 10 all time.
Winning isn't the sole criteria but winning while being at the peak of your powers matters, especially if you were in a position to do so.
No one cares about Maradona without the 86 WC and his performances there.
No one cares about R9 without the 2002 WC and his performances there. He was a non factor in CL for the most part.
No one cares about Messi without the CL performances like v Madrid, Bayern, United etc. and the 3-4 CLs.
Argentina in 2014 was among the top 4 teams in the world. Yes, they weren't the strongest but if Messi had squeezed out 110% of what he was capable of for that one game, Argentina likely would have squeaked past a dominant Germany. And that would have ended the debate because he would have been the first great to dominate a WC and multiple CLs.
For me, he's in the mix right now with Maradona and Pele. CR7, DiStefano, Cruyff are probably the next 3 in the mix.