Stronger upfront although it doesn't show yet because Suarez hasn't fully settled. Neymar only really started converting regularly after a whole season at Barca so expect the same with Suarez. Has been a slow starter in all his clubs:
At Ajax 10 goals in his first 29 games. Before he left Ajax 42 goals in his last 46 games. Liverpool 15 goals in his first 44 games. Before he left Liverpool 31 goals in his last 33 games.
Just because he is the best striker in the world on paper doesn't mean he must start firing on all cyclinders and if he doesn't the coach is responsible. He has missed enough chances to be on double figures already. That's on him and solely on him. He needs time, that's all.
Better depth in defense with 2 reliable goalkeepers + Mathieu and Bartra more experienced. Although not a big difference compared to Pique-Mascherano last season quality wise, just better depth.
Midfield: Xavi got another year older, Iniesta continues to decline, Sergi Roberto and Rafinha are kids and they aren't Verratti or Isco talent level kids. So basically all hope in central midfield is Rakitic who is playing worse than Cesc. If I say this you know it's bad. Again nothing to do with tactics or coaching. He attempted a throughball today and it went 20 yards out of the field. Coach's fault my ass (well, maybe for buying him in the first place if it was his decision that is): The midfield is worse. I still can't grasp how people blame "we have no midfield" on the coach. The quality is not there. How much more obvious can this get?
Oh, yes, let's also not forget Alves' continous decline.
The team plays much better defense and has much better pressing. This is reflected in goals conceded as well as Bravo's save statistics. He averages 1.59 saves per game. Under Tata Valdes had to make 2.31 saves per game. That's 30 % less shots Bravo is facing on goal. Defensive statistics are 3th best in Europe. Only Bayern are better but they also play in a Mickey Mouse league. Bravo is conceding 0.47 goals per game. Valdes conceded 0.81 goals per game.
Going forward not as fluid yet as under Tata. Most of that is down to Suarez ruining a lot of attacks with bad touches and non existent creativity from midfield. Mainly non existent creativity from midfield.
It was down to Barca losing or drawing against Real Sociedad at Anoeta since the Rijkaard days. lol No rational explanation. Barca never win there. La Real have beaten Atletico and Real Madrid at home this season, too. It happens. The right side being Munir-Montoya and the left side Pedro didn't help. With Messi and Neymar and Alves starting might have gotten something out of the game. That lineup wasn't the most glorious decision of Lucho, for sure.
Mate. If you paid attention Lucho was SCREAMING on the sidelines and signaling to be more compact in the Clasico. I would have been worried if here were oblivious to it but he clearly isn't. There is a difference between theory and execution though. Do you remember Mourinho's first Clasico? Obviously you do, who doesn't? It was the 13th matchday yet his team was still all over the place. Like HISTORICALLY all over the place. Do you also remember 6 months later in the Copa del Rey final and how the organization of his team changed? Once again: time. You guys are judging a manager who hasn't even had half a season yet. Who cares about structural problems in El Clasico? It was the 9th game of the season. Even then 2 goals were completely avoidable individual mistakes by Pique and Iniesta and the 3th was a set piece which is hard to defend against against Pepe, Ramos and Co. Even Simeone's thugs almost conceded from a Ramos header yesterday.
lol These freak games happen all the time. Remember the Valencia collapse last season? If not I will help you out: