JamDav1982
Senior Member
No hes not.
He is over rated when the EPL media started making out he was best in world but he has been miles better than Sirigu these past couple of seasons.
Luis Enrique
- Thread starter Barcaman
- Start date
No hes not.
He is over rated when the EPL media started making out he was best in world but he has been miles better than Sirigu these past couple of seasons.
serghei
Senior Member
Aguero could also play in a 4-3-3. Plenty of options. Ibra would be the target man in pretty much every team in the world except us, Bayern and Real.
JamDav1982
Senior Member
No way would Aguero play wide in a 4-3-3 in a PSG/Man City mix. Plenty of other players would be ahead of him for that postion.
Aguero is the better CF at moment for me and that is only debate.
serghei
Senior Member
One year ago, Hart was warming the bench and Pantilimon played for City. Hart is one of those keepers that could burry a team at any moment.
DonAK
President of FC Barcelona
How much have you watched of Sirigu the last couple of seasons?
L
linetty
Guest
Matuidi and Verratti are better than any midfielders citeh have bar Silva. Thiago Silva is better than kompany, Luiz better than demichelis or mangala, sirigu certainly better than Hart, maxwell is defo better than clichy, Zabaleta is better than vdw or aurier
JamDav1982
Senior Member
Plenty and he has never looked that good to me and Hart has been better even though Hart was massively over rated for a while.
JamDav1982
Senior Member
Matuidi isnt better than Yaya these past few years it hasnt even been close.
Why change the rules so that you compare Kompany to Silva? Compare Kompany to Luiz is much more accurate and Kompany is better. Or just say who are the best two centre halfs.
Clichy and Maxwell not much in but I would have Clichy. Dont think either are top notch though.
Also Veratti and Matuidi dont even play remotely same position as Silva.
L
linetty
Guest
Why would pick the rules so they suit you? You compared Luiz to kompany on purpose beceause the latter is better but if you compare him to Thiago Silva it makes a difference eh?
JamDav1982
Senior Member
Of course it makes a difference as clearly Kompany is better than Luiz and would be one of the two CBs picked in the team.
Its like saying I would pick Aguero ahead of Ibrahimovic up front in a two. Just to try and leave Ibra out the team.
When really you would just choose the best two strikers and not try to use strange logic to try and eliminate the ones you dont like.
The reason it would be more accurate to compare Luiz and Kompany is because those two are clearly inferior to Silva and would be the debate for the second CB spot.
Icarium
Lifestealer
Somehow i knew it would evolve into a debate. City are a better team as a whole, if you consider players and style of football and stuff like that. PSG has good young players which city lack right now Moura, Verratti, Marquinhos, Aurier .... but for now city are more dangerous team than psg. Luiz is not better than demichelis at CB position at least.
Last edited:
Semi-Neutral
Sir Alupp Heynrguson
------Ibra-----------------------Aguero-------
-------Silva----------------------Moura-------
----------Veratti--------------Toure----------
---Maxwell---Silva--Kompany---Zabaleta---
-------------------Sirigu---------------------
With Aguero sometimes dropping into midfield and drifting out wide, Toure and Veratti taking turns going forward. So PSG have slight advantage, 6 to 5, but then the bench lineup....
-------------------------Bony-----------------------
-------Lavezzi---------Nasri----------Milner-------
----------------Fernadinho-----Matuidi-------------
----Clichy-------Luiz--------Mangala-----Sagna---
------------------------Hart-------------------------
3 to 8.... Sure, bench doesn't matter as much if everyone is fit, but when does that happen? There's always random injuries that crop up, and City's depth is much better than PSG's. This is pretty subjective though, some people might want to play Cavani or Pastore or Navas or Fernando or Aurier
-------Silva----------------------Moura-------
----------Veratti--------------Toure----------
---Maxwell---Silva--Kompany---Zabaleta---
-------------------Sirigu---------------------
With Aguero sometimes dropping into midfield and drifting out wide, Toure and Veratti taking turns going forward. So PSG have slight advantage, 6 to 5, but then the bench lineup....
-------------------------Bony-----------------------
-------Lavezzi---------Nasri----------Milner-------
----------------Fernadinho-----Matuidi-------------
----Clichy-------Luiz--------Mangala-----Sagna---
------------------------Hart-------------------------
3 to 8.... Sure, bench doesn't matter as much if everyone is fit, but when does that happen? There's always random injuries that crop up, and City's depth is much better than PSG's. This is pretty subjective though, some people might want to play Cavani or Pastore or Navas or Fernando or Aurier
serghei
Senior Member
Right, that's why they barely made it out of their group, while PSG was unlucky not to make the semis both last year and the year before, having been eliminated two times because of the away goal rule. There is not the slightest shred of evidence to put City over PSG on european level. None.
L
linetty
Guest
JamDav1982
Senior Member
Why were PSG unlucky not to make semis?
They couldnt eliminate a Barca missing Messi for the most part and an average Chelsea side that was inferior to Man City.
Are Chelsea better than Barca as had better CL history the past 3 seasons?
Home of Barca Fans
