F
Flavia
Guest
He rested Busi today. MSN, after the game is 4-0 or 5-0, is not really needed. They were resting in the pitch.
I agree with Flavia. They know how to rest while on the pitch.
Ok, we'll see in March how much energy with 30 year old Messi (after 10+ years of 60+ matches per season, virtually without any rest) have.
Without Messi on fire, we are a totally different team.
One more question (one more time):
1. we played 9-10 starters against Celtic
2. we play against Leganes away on weekend
3. we play against Atletico next Wednesday and away at Gijon on weekend, than a CL away in Germany and Celta away
Do you think that Lucho will play strong lineup or poor lineup against Leganes, since we have 4 tough matches after that (or 5 matches in a row)?
What are people's predictions for a lineup against Leganes?
Read the comments and surprised that I am only one who thinks he is not to be blamed for making so much rotations.
If we can't rest key men and give backups a run vs. Alaves, at home, just after internationals, after spending 100 million on backups.. Then I don't know when and where he is supposed to rotate.
Blame is on players. First and foremost on those who are expected and paid to excell like Neymar. Others too failed. Sorry, but Vidal, Denis and others are good enough for Alaves on 9/10 occasions. We also had few individual mistakes that led to Alaves goals and good old complacency kicked in too.
Problem isn't the quality of backups, merely motivation. There wasn't sense of urgency tonight with our boys.
I will repeat:
Did we really need to play with only 5-6 starters against Alaves so that we could save players for this awful Celtic team at Camp Nou?
I still think that we had to play with 8 starters both against Alaves and Celtic.
And not with a 2nd tier lineup against Alaves and with full strength against poor, poor Celtic.
Again, if Lucho will now rest players against Leganes, that will be a really poor planning.
It was 5:0 in the 60th minute. Why he didn't sub any of MSN after that?
What, our goal is to keep MSN and waste their energy in 5:0 and 7:0 trashings against Mickey Mouse opponents?
I don't get it, seriously.
I will repeat:
Did we really need to play with only 5-6 starters against Alaves so that we could save players for this awful Celtic team at Camp Nou?
I still think that we had to play with 8 starters both against Alaves and Celtic.
And not with a 2nd tier lineup against Alaves and with full strength against poor, poor Celtic.
Again, if Lucho will now rest players against Leganes, that will be a really poor planning.
It was 5:0 in the 60th minute. Why he didn't sub any of MSN after that?
What, our goal is to keep MSN and waste their energy in 5:0 and 7:0 trashings against Mickey Mouse opponents?
I don't get it, seriously.
As I said before I agree with your overall point about rotations. But looking just at Alaves game I think it was more than just resting/saving players for Celtic.
Player for player analysis for those who started over (projected) best XI...
- Cillessen had to play because MATS was injured, no rotation here. Would MATS play if this was El Clasico or CL final instead of Alaves? Maybe they would force him if they wouldn't trust Jasper enough, but in general you don't play injured players.
- Paco - Suarez had apparently come back from NT very tired so rest was understandable. Paco was the obvious choice to start in his place.
- Arda - Messi was coming back from an injury and it was smart not to risk him. Most of people here agreed with that before the game and they would get crazy had Lucho started him (in what they believe should be an easy game for us anyway) and he would get reinjured and miss a month or two. Also, Arda was in good form (yes, he played this time in Messi's position not Neymar's but still) so it was understandable that he started instead of Messi.
- Denis - Gomes was injured and Iniesta was still not fit enough to play more than 30 minutes and he also didn't start against Celtic so I think Lucho just wants to slowly integrate him back after injury. My guess is he won't start tomorrow either as Lucho wants him to go full 90 minutes (or at least 70) against Atletico if needed.
I can understand Lucho's decision not to start Suarez, Messi and/or Iniesta and MATS was injured. So that's 4 of our best XI that didn't start because of the reasons I can accept.
For others:
- Pique - didn't he also get back with some minor injury after NT break? Maybe that's why he was rested. There is a question for Lopetegui though. Why did Pique and Busquets play 90 minutes against Liechtenstein?
- Roberto - if we can't start Vidal in games like this what is the point to have him in team? Roberto will play a lot this season and he does need a rest here and there. Lucho probably thought Alaves was a good game for that and it could possibly be on another occasion but not this time when he also decided to rest Pique and Alba and was also without his first GK and two best attacking players.
- Alba - I think Lucho liked what Digne has done so far so he decided to start him. He wasn't great but was still one of our best players. Maybe Alba's better understanding with Neymar would help us more in attack so yes, he should probably play but then again, he played both games for Spain while Digne didn't play for France.
- Masche - that's the only individual choice that I didn't understand. He played two games for Argentina and was just overloaded I think. Umtiti should start over him but if Lucho decided to give rest to Pique he was the obviuos choice to start as I don't think Lucho would play Mathieu and Umtiti together.
Would it make a difference had Roberto, Pique and/or Umtiti started? Probably. But would that difference be big enough to compensate for Messi, Suarez and Iniesta not starting? We don't know that. The whole team just looked off like it's often after NT breaks.
So overall, I agree that rotating 6 or 7 players from one game to another is too much and I hope we won't see that again. Especially if two players are playing their first game after just 2-3 trainings with the team, other two are also newcomers and Neymar had returned after 4 months away. As already said in previous posts no chemistry between them was expected. But looking individually I think Lucho didn't rotate/rest players just for Celtic game like you said but was thinking longterm. He didn't want to risk important players that were injured/tired/not fit enough to start so he wouldn't lose them for longer period. I think we can agree it's better to lose 3 points than Messi or Suarez being out for 2 months.
Still, lineup he selected was good enough and should win against Alaves if they'd all perform like they can. They didn't and even impact subs like Messi or Suarez didn't have impact they could have on another day coming off the bench. It wasn't our day but bad days happen every season for every team. Better now than in April next year.
Dude, it's Masip.
Not Matip. Matip plays for Liverpool.
I know this. I can't explain how that just happend
Thought I was seeing things, which is why I deleted my post.